Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Minister of Justice and Correctional Services v POPCRU obo Basini (C323/2021) [2025] ZALCCT 38 (5 June 2025)
The Labour Court dismissed a review of an arbitration award holding that the OSD salary structure applied to a promoted correctional official.
Sullivan and Others v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Others (37166/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 197 (29 February 2024)
The court granted interim relief restoring technical allowances to three SANDF employees pending grievances and possible review proceedings, finding the discontinuance likely unlawful.
Thaba and Others v Pietersburg Opleiding Tee Klub (SAPS) (J312/17) [2024] ZALCJHB 46 (14 February 2024)
The Labour Court found the respondent had not complied with a reinstatement award and made the CCMA award an order of court, with costs.
City Of Cape Town v South African Local Government and Others (C47/2020) [2024] ZALCCT 8 (12 February 2024)
The Labour Court dismissed a review of an award finding that Cape Town’s delay in job re-evaluation was an unfair labour practice.
Lebelo and Others v City of Johannesburg Metropolitian Municipality (J2055/2014) [2024] ZALCJHB 23 (22 January 2024)
The Labour Court dismissed a discrimination claim by converted municipal employees, finding the sunset clause rational and the service bonus already built into total remuneration.
H & H Specialized Services (Pty) Ltd v Bezuidenhout and Others (J318/21) [2023] ZALCJHB 333 (22 November 2023)
The writ of execution was set aside because it was issued for an amount inclusive of VAT, based on an invoice, rather than for remuneration as ordered by the Consented Order. The Consented Order required payment of remuneration for the suspension period, which, in the context of an employment relationship, obliged the applicant to deduct employee's tax before payment. The respondent's refusal to provide tax information prevented the applicant from complying with the order. The writ was therefore not in conformity with the judgment and could not be enforced as issued. The applicant's obligatio…
Source excerpt
Mncwati and Others v King Sabata Dalindyebo Local Municipality (5448/2021) [2023] ZAECMHC 44 (22 August 2023)
The court held that the municipality must reflect the agreed 6% shift allowance rate on applicants’ payslips, but refused to interfere with salary calculation under the collective agreement.
Deep Blue Ocean Trading 787 CC t/a Avemel and Another v DETAWU on behalf of Six Members and Others (D247/2022) [2022] ZALCD 48 (20 September 2022)
Labour Court dismissed a stay and interdict application over enforcement of a bargaining council award, finding no clear right, irreparable harm, or proper tax basis.
RFS Administrators (PTY) LTD v Samons and Others (JS 641/17) [2022] ZALCJHB 110 (30 August 2022)
The court found that the applicant failed to prove the existence of an employment contract with the respondents at the time the bonus payments were made. The evidence established that the respondents' employment with the applicant had terminated when they were appointed by the Funds, and any subsequent remuneration or HR arrangements were governed by the Funds, not the applicant. The HR Policy and its addendum did not apply to the respondents, as there was no employer-employee relationship with the applicant. The payments received by the respondents were not secret profits, but bonuses paid b…
Source excerpt
Mkhwanazi and Another v Unitrans Supply Chain Solutions (PTY) Ltd (27 July 2022) (JS 1087/12) [2022] ZALCJHB 201 (27 July 2022)
The court found that the respondent offered the applicants reasonable alternative employment in Johannesburg, including a relocation allowance, temporary accommodation, and the prospect of future salary increases. The reduction in hourly rates was justified by the terms of the new contract and parity among employees. The applicants' refusal to accept the alternative employment was based solely on the reduced rates, which amounted to a loss of approximately R300 per month. The court held that this refusal was unreasonable, especially given the respondent's efforts to avoid retrenchment and the…
Source excerpt
Explore more
