Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2010] ZASCA 57

Madzhadzhi and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (160/09)

Madzhadzhi and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (160/09) [2010] ZASCA 57; [2010] 4 All SA 1 (SCA) ; 2010 (12) BCLR 1309 (SCA) (1 April 2010)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 5(2) of the Remuneration of Public Office Bearers Act does not prohibit traditional leaders from receiving a salary as headmen if they are also employed as public servants. The term 'public office' in section 5(2) refers only to elected officials and traditional leaders, not public service employees. The provincial government was not entitled to invoke section 5(2) to terminate the salaries of headmen who were also public servants. However, the application for declaratory relief was refused because granting such an order would not undo the consequ…

  • Remuneration Of Traditional Leaders
  • Declaratory Relief
  • Unfair Discrimination
  • Provincial Vs National Competence
  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Salary Determination
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1996] ZACC 15

In re: KwaZulu-Natal Amakhosi and Iziphakanyiswa Amendment Bill of 1995, In re: Payment of Salaries. Allowances and Other privileges to the Ingonyama Bill of 1995 (CCT1/96, CCT6/96)

In re: KwaZulu-Natal Amakhosi and Iziphakanyiswa Amendment Bill of 1995, In re: Payment of Salaries. Allowances and Other privileges to the Ingonyama Bill of 1995 (CCT1/96, CCT6/96) [1996] ZACC 15; 1996 (7) BCLR 903; 1996 (4) SA 653 (5 July 1996)

The Constitutional Court held that the KwaZulu-Natal provincial legislature had the competence to repeal or amend the Amakhosi and Ingonyama Acts, as these Acts dealt with matters within Schedule 6 of the Constitution, namely traditional authorities and indigenous law. The disputed provisions, which prohibited traditional leaders from accepting remuneration from other organs of state except as provided by provincial law, were found to be reasonable conditions of office and incidental to the legislative competence of the province. The Court rejected arguments that the amendments constituted an…

  • Provincial Legislative Competence
  • Remuneration Of Traditional Leaders
  • Customary Law
  • Property Rights
  • Economic Activity Rights
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.