Sasfin Bank Limited and Another v Baitshoki Secondary School (Leave to Appeal) (6696/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 702 (21 July 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
6696/2022
Judge
P V Ternent
The High Court refused leave to appeal against summary judgment, finding no reasonable prospect of success and dismissing the defendant’s application with costs.
Technologies Acceptances Receivables (Pty) Limited and Others v Selebogo Incorporated and Another (2022/001657) [2025] ZAGPJHC 491 (21 May 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/001657
Judge
L Putter
The High Court refused summary judgment in a dispute over rental agreements for office equipment, finding the cancellation and repossession issues should go to trial.
Carospan (Ltd) t-a Nashua Bloemfontein v Manyoni and Gija Investment CC and Another (4213/2021) [2022] ZAFSHC 162 (24 June 2022)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
4213/2021
Judge
N.S. Daniso
The court found that the respondents failed to raise a bona fide defence in their plea and opposing affidavit. The National Credit Act does not apply to the rental agreements, as they are not credit agreements but rental contracts with ownership retained by the applicant. Delivery of goods was confirmed by the second respondent's signature on acceptance certificates, and the respondents did not dispute the veracity of the signature or specify which goods were allegedly not delivered. The respondents' attempt to amplify their defence in heads of argument was irregular and not considered. The a…
Man Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd v FST Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Others (15/12692) [2015] ZAGPJHC 226 (5 October 2015)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
15/12692
Judge
S Yacoob
High Court ordered the return of 15 trucks and 9 trailers after rejecting the respondent’s version of a varied use agreement and finding it untenable.
Technologies Acceptance (Pty) Ltd v Nsovo Ya Rixaka CC and Another (31805/08) [2012] ZAGPPHC 222 (5 October 2012)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
31805/08
Judge
Janse van Nieuwenhuizen
High Court held that a replacement-equipment clause did not create a new rental agreement, dismissing prescription and granting the plaintiff cancellation, payment, interest, and costs.