Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAECGHC 124

Hlumisa Technologies (Pty) Ltd and Another v Nedbank Ltd and Others (3304/2019)

Hlumisa Technologies (Pty) Ltd and Another v Nedbank Ltd and Others (3304/2019) [2019] ZAECGHC 124; 2020 (4) SA 553 (ECG) (10 December 2019)

The court held that the filing of an application for rescission of a final liquidation order does not automatically suspend the operation and execution of that order. The correct procedure for seeking suspension is to apply under Rule 45A of the Uniform Rules of Court. The court found that the applicants' reliance on common law and repealed Rule 49(11) was misplaced, and that the legislature's intention is clear from the current statutory framework. Automatic suspension would lead to abuse and frustrate the operation of court orders, particularly in liquidation matters. The application was th…

  • Liquidation Orders
  • Suspension Of Judgments
  • Rule 45a
  • Rescission Applications
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.