Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Nala Local Municipality v Handax Machinery (Pty) Limited and Another (570/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 219 (26 July 2024)
The court granted urgent spoliation relief, ordering return of two municipal trucks removed under the pretext of roadworthiness testing.
Gatsby Vibe Salon (Pty) Ltd v Hgbahiwe and Another (2023/082751) [2023] ZAGPJHC 995 (6 September 2023)
The High Court granted a spoliation order restoring a salon’s possession of rented business premises after the first respondent changed the locks and took control.
NUMSA obo Members and Others v AIH Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Another (D 1112/19) [2023] ZALCD 3 (27 February 2023)
The Labour Court held that the purported transfer was not a section 197 transfer of a business as a going concern, and restored the applicants’ prior employment status.
Numsa obo Members and Others v AIH Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Another (D 1112/19) [2023] ZALCD 2; (2023) 44 ILJ 1099 (LC); [2023] 5 BLLR 459 (LC) (27 January 2023)
The Labour Court held that the transfer to AIH Logistics was not a section 197 transfer of a business as a going concern and ordered restoration of the prior employment position.
Intsika Yethu Local Municipality v Unlawful persons unlawfully erecting structures on and unlawfully occupying that portion of remainder erf 1, Cofimvaba just next to Nyandeni Township and Another (3303/2014) [2017] ZAECMHC 33 (12 September 2017)
The court found that the respondents' Rule 6(11) and Rule 41(1)(c) applications were not irregular proceedings under Rule 30, as the eviction application remained pending and substantive issues, including ownership of the land and alleged constitutional rights violations, had not been resolved. The court rejected the applicant's argument that the eviction application was moot or a 'dead letter', noting that the rescission of the default order restored the status quo ante and required the court to consider the rights and remedies sought by the respondents. The factual and legal submissions in…
Source excerpt
J v S (2016/13621) [2016] ZAGPJHC 125 (24 May 2016)
The High Court set aside an ex parte order in a child-care dispute after finding the applicant withheld material facts and misled the court.
Wilson v John Snow Public Health Group Incorporated in Massachusetts USA (8679/2008) [2008] ZAGPHC 222 (26 March 2008)
The High Court held that Wilson’s removal as sole director of John Snow Public Health Group was unlawful and ordered reinstatement and punitive costs.
Mukwevho and Others v ECCAWUSA (J3946/98) [1998] ZALC 148 (17 December 1998)
The Labour Court dismissed an urgent bid to restore employment terms after a unilateral change, holding the applicants had not complied with section 64(4) of the LRA.
Explore more
