Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2000] ZACC 3

Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT45/99)

Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT45/99) [2000] ZACC 3; 2000 (5) BCLR 465 ; 2000 (2) SA 837 (CC) (30 March 2000)

The Constitutional Court dismissed a late application for condonation and special leave, finding no basis to apply constitutional principles retrospectively to the earlier sale in execution.

  • Access To Courts
  • Retrospective Application Of Constitution
  • Sale In Execution
  • Development Of Common Law
  • Condonation
  • Late-appeal
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1996] ZACC 19

Tsotetsi v Mutual and Federal Insurance Company Ltd (CCT16/95)

Tsotetsi v Mutual and Federal Insurance Company Ltd (CCT16/95) [1996] ZACC 19; 1996 (11) BCLR 1439; 1997 (1) SA 585 (12 September 1996)

The Constitutional Court held that the referral from the Transvaal Provincial Division was not competent because the issue referred could not be decisive of the case before that court. The accident and the applicant's claim arose before the Constitution came into force, and the respondent's liability was fixed at the time of the accident. The Constitution does not apply retrospectively to rights vested before its commencement, and no exceptional circumstances exist to warrant a departure from this principle. The applicant's arguments regarding the nature of the respondent and the alleged gros…

  • Retrospective Application Of Constitution
  • Direct Access
  • Motor Vehicle Accident Fund
  • Limitation Of Damages
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1996] ZACC 13

Rudolph and Another v Commissioner for Inland Revenue and Others (CCT13/96)

Rudolph and Another v Commissioner for Inland Revenue and Others (CCT13/96) [1996] ZACC 13; 1996 (7) BCLR 889; 1996 (4) SA 552 (11 June 1996)

The Constitutional Court held that section 74(3) of the Income Tax Act was not subject to constitutional scrutiny in this case because all relevant acts—issuing authorizations, searching, and seizing documents—were completed before the interim Constitution came into operation. The concept of 'seizure' was interpreted in its ordinary sense, meaning effective deprivation of possession and control, which occurred prior to the Constitution's commencement. Consequently, the Constitution did not apply, and the Appellate Division retained jurisdiction to adjudicate the common law grounds of invalidi…

  • Search And Seizure
  • Jurisdiction Of Courts
  • Retrospective Application Of Constitution
  • Income Tax Act Section 74 3
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1996] ZACC 11

Gardener v Whitaker (CCT26/94)

Gardener v Whitaker (CCT26/94) [1996] ZACC 11; 1996 (6) BCLR 775; 1996 (4) SA 337 (15 May 1996)

The Constitutional Court held that although constitutional issues were raised regarding the application of Chapter 3 to private litigation and the development of the common law of defamation, the case also involved factual and mixed law issues suitable for the Appellate Division. The lower court's judgment was based on the development of the common law in light of constitutional values, not on direct horizontal application of constitutional rights. The Constitutional Court does not have jurisdiction to choose between competing versions of the common law, and appeals involving both constitutio…

  • Horizontal Application Of Bill Of Rights
  • Retrospective Application Of Constitution
  • Defamation
  • Qualified Privilege
  • Freedom Of Expression
  • Human Dignity
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1996] ZACC 25

Key v Attorney-General, Cape Provincial Division, and Another (CCT 21/94)

Key v Attorney-General, Cape Provincial Division, and Another (CCT 21/94) [1996] ZACC 25; 1996 (4) SA 187 (CC); 1996 (6) BCLR 788 (15 May 1996)

The Constitutional Court held that the Constitution does not operate retrospectively to invalidate conduct or evidence obtained prior to its commencement. The search, seizure, and disclosure of documents under sections 6 and 7 of the Investigation of Serious Economic Offences Act occurred before 27 April 1994, and the applicant's constitutional rights did not exist at that time. Therefore, the evidence obtained is not rendered inadmissible solely by the coming into force of the Constitution. The admissibility of such evidence in criminal proceedings must be determined by the trial judge, cons…

  • Retrospective Application Of Constitution
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Right To Privacy
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Search And Seizure
  • Investigation Of Serious Economic Offences
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.