Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2022] ZAFSHC 254

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (A62/2022)

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (A62/2022) [2022] ZAFSHC 254 (13 October 2022)

The High Court dismissed a review of a municipal tender award, finding substantial compliance with procurement requirements and refusing to set aside the contract.

  • Municipal Procurement
  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Bid Evaluation
  • Cidb Grading Requirements
  • Returnable Documents
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2022] ZAFSHC 289

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (A62/2022)

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (A62/2022) [2022] ZAFSHC 289 (13 October 2022)

High Court review of a municipal tender award dismissed; the court found no material irregularity and refused to set aside the contract or substitute the applicant.

  • Municipal Procurement
  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Bid Evaluation
  • Cidb Grading Requirements
  • Returnable Documents
  • Just And Equitable Remedy
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2018] ZASCA 72

WDR Earthmoving Enterprises and Another v Joe Gqabi District Municipality and Others (392/2017)

WDR Earthmoving Enterprises and Another v Joe Gqabi District Municipality and Others (392/2017) [2018] ZASCA 72 (30 May 2018)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the requirement to submit three years of audited annual financial statements was a peremptory statutory obligation under the Municipal Supply Chain Management Regulations and the tender conditions. Both the appellants and the fourth respondent declared they were legally obliged to submit such statements but failed to do so. The municipality had no discretion to condone non-compliance with this requirement. The appellants' bid was correctly declared non-responsive, and their appeal on this point failed. However, the fourth respondent's bid was also non-res…

  • Municipal Supply Chain Management
  • Tender Non Responsiveness
  • Standing In Review Applications
  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Returnable Documents
  • Judicial Review
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.