Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2025] ZALCJHB 127

Groom v Dailmer Fleet Management and Others (JS1036/18)

Groom v Dailmer Fleet Management and Others (JS1036/18) [2025] ZALCJHB 127 (26 March 2025)

The Labour Court revived an archived referral, finding good cause based on related litigation, the respondents’ conduct, and the applicant’s explanation for delay.

  • Practice Manual Archiving
  • Revival Of Proceedings
  • Condonation
  • Unfair Dismissal
  • Specific Performance
  • Breach Of Contract
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2023] ZALCJHB 284

Semela and Another v Gauteng Department of Economic Development and Others (J590/21)

Semela and Another v Gauteng Department of Economic Development and Others (J590/21) [2023] ZALCJHB 284 (17 October 2023)

The court found that the applicants were not entitled to revive the rule nisi that had been discharged by agreement between the parties and under different circumstances. The relief sought was not to find the respondents guilty of contempt, but to revive the previous contempt application, which was procedurally incorrect. The applicants failed to launch a fresh contempt of court application against the current respondents for alleged non-compliance with the Mkwibiso AJ order. The circumstances required a new application, not a revival of the discharged rule nisi. The court held that the requi…

  • Contempt Of Court
  • Arbitration Award Enforcement
  • Rule Nisi
  • Revival Of Proceedings
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2013] ZASCA 185

Motala and Others v Master of the High Court and Others (313/13)

Motala and Others v Master of the High Court and Others (313/13) [2013] ZASCA 185; [2014] 2 All SA 154 (SCA) (29 November 2013)

The court held that even if section 420 of the Companies Act could be interpreted to revive proceedings commenced prior to dissolution, the application must fail because the appellants did not demonstrate that the avoidance of dissolution would serve the interests of creditors. There was no evidence that creditors supported the application or were aware of the litigation. The claim was speculative, and the liquidators failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the dissolution while litigation was ongoing. The prejudice to the respondents from resuming litigation after many years was sig…

  • Company Dissolution
  • Liquidation Proceedings
  • Court Discretion
  • Revival Of Proceedings
  • Creditor Interest
  • Administrative Error
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.