Du Plessis v S (A267/11) [2011] ZAWCHC 522 (11 November 2011)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A267/11
Judges
Veldhuizen, Saba
The High Court set aside a maintenance-order conviction and sentence after the appellant was denied the chance to cross-examine a witness, finding a procedural irregularity.
S v Msimango and Another (187/2005) [2009] ZAGPJHC 34; [2009] 4 All SA 529 (GSJ) ; 2010 (1) SACR 544 (GSJ) (27 July 2009)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
187/2005
Judge
Moshidi
The court held that no probative value should be attached to the evidence of a witness whose cross-examination was incomplete due to death or other absence, regardless of whether the witness was called by the prosecution, defence, or the court. This approach is justified by the constitutional right to adduce and challenge evidence, which includes the right to cross-examine. The court found that accepting such evidence would undermine the fairness of the trial and could not pass constitutional scrutiny. In the present case, although the deceased witness, Insp Obisi, was not the sole witness on…
S v Voorby (41/01) [2001] ZANWHC 31 (15 June 2001)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
41/01
Judges
M M Leeuw, B E Nkabinde
Review judgment setting aside convictions on two counts after a denial of cross-examination, and confirming only the count 3 conviction with a substituted sentence.