Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Environmental Law [2024] ZAMPMBHC 28

Komatipoort Despondent Residents Association v Nkomazi Local Municipality and Others (2832/2023)

Komatipoort Despondent Residents Association v Nkomazi Local Municipality and Others (2832/2023) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 28 (19 April 2024)

Court
Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
Case number
2832/2023
Judge
Vukeya

The court found the applicant had locus standi under sections 24 and 38 of the Constitution, acting in the public interest and as an association for its members. The failure to issue a Rule 16A notice was not fatal, as the matter concerned enforcement of constitutional rights rather than a constitutional challenge, and the interests of justice warranted dispensing with the notice. The court held that declaratory orders may be granted with interim effect where urgent environmental harm is alleged. Internal remedies via IUCMA were not mandatory, and the applicant had shown attempts to engage th…

Source excerpt

  • Municipal Service Delivery
  • Right To Environment
  • Sewage Pollution
  • Locus Standi
  • Interim Relief
  • Contempt Of Court
Read case analysis
Delict [2010] ZAWCHC 6

Van Rensburg and Another v Cloete and Another (8270/09)

Van Rensburg and Another v Cloete and Another (8270/09) [2010] ZAWCHC 6 (28 January 2010)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
8270/09
Judge
E Moosa

The court found that the respondents' complaints, some of which were well-founded, were made out of legitimate concern for health, environment, and legality, and did not constitute unlawful defamation or personal attacks on the applicants. The right to freedom of expression and the right to an environment not harmful to health and well-being outweighed the applicants' interests in reputation and privacy. The applicants failed to establish a clear right or the absence of alternative remedies, as they could pursue damages or criminal charges if necessary. There was no evidence of continuing tre…

Source excerpt

  • Defamation
  • Final Interdict
  • Freedom Of Expression
  • Right To Environment
  • Trespass
  • Privacy Infringement
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.