Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2011] ZAEC 2

African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission (003/11 IEC)

African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission (003/11 IEC) [2011] ZAEC 2 (20 April 2011)

Court
Electoral Court
Case number
003/11 IEC
Judges
Masipa, Mthiyane, Pillay

The court found that the applicant had complied with the substantive requirements of sections 14 and 17 of the Local Government: Municipal Electoral Act by submitting the necessary documents and deposit before the deadline. The error in the municipality designation number was a genuine clerical mistake, and the applicant's intention to contest in Umhlabuyalingana was clear. The Commission's refusal to reallocate the deposit was unjustified, especially in light of constitutional principles favouring enfranchisement and previous judicial interpretations supporting a purposive approach to the Ac…

Source excerpt

  • Electoral Deposit
  • Enfranchisement
  • Interpretation Of Electoral Act
  • Right To Participate In Elections
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2006] ZACC 1

African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission and Others (CCT 10/06)

African Christian Democratic Party v Electoral Commission and Others (CCT 10/06) [2006] ZACC 1; 2006(3) SA 305 (CC); 2006(5) BCLR 579 (CC) (24 February 2006)

Court
Constitutional Court
Case number
CCT 10/06
Judges
O'Regan, Langa, Moseneke, Madala, Mokgoro, Ngcobo, Nkabinde, Sachs, Van der Westhuizen, Yacoob, Skweyiya

The majority held that the applicant had complied with sections 14 and 17 of the Municipal Electoral Act in substance, as the Electoral Commission was in possession of surplus funds paid by the applicant for election deposits at the relevant deadline. The omission to allocate the surplus to the Cape Town Metro was an error, but did not defeat the legislative purpose of the deposit requirement, which is to ensure serious intention to contest. The Court found that a narrow, formalistic interpretation would unjustifiably exclude a significant number of voters and undermine constitutional values…

Source excerpt

  • Municipal Elections
  • Electoral Deposit Requirements
  • Substantive Compliance
  • Right To Participate In Elections
  • Interpretation Of Electoral Statutes
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.