Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZANWHC 117

Northern Cape Livestock Vryburg Co-op Ltd v Grootbos Voerkrale (Pty) Ltd and Another (1880/2023)

Northern Cape Livestock Vryburg Co-op Ltd v Grootbos Voerkrale (Pty) Ltd and Another (1880/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 117 (14 July 2025)

The High Court upheld an exception to amended particulars of claim, finding the damages pleading too vague to assess, and gave the plaintiffs 20 days to amend.

  • Vague And Embarrassing Pleading
  • Quantification Of Damages
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Exception Procedure
  • Delictual Liability
  • Commercial Loss
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 518

Mirai Rail Corporation (Pty) Ltd v H Rohloff (Pty) Ltd (030891/2022)

Mirai Rail Corporation (Pty) Ltd v H Rohloff (Pty) Ltd (030891/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 518 (6 June 2024)

The High Court upheld an exception to a plea and counterclaim that lacked necessary averments and was vague and embarrassing, with leave to amend.

  • Exception To Pleading
  • Vague And Embarrassing
  • Lack Of Cause Of Action
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Damages Claim Pleading
  • Double Dipping
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 343

Nedbank Limited v Madonsela (2022/044542)

Nedbank Limited v Madonsela (2022/044542) [2024] ZAGPPHC 343 (8 April 2024)

The High Court upheld an exception to vague particulars of claim, set them aside with leave to amend, and dismissed a premature summary judgment application.

  • Exception To Pleading
  • Summary Judgment
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Irregular Step
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAECMKHC 42

Maziya General Services CC v Minister of Public Works N.O and Another (Appeal) (CA 240/2022)

Maziya General Services CC v Minister of Public Works N.O and Another (Appeal) (CA 240/2022) [2024] ZAECMKHC 42 (6 February 2024)

The High Court upheld an appeal against an exception, finding the pleadings in a joint-venture repudiation claim were sufficiently detailed under Rule 18(4).

  • Exception Procedure
  • Joint Venture Liability
  • Co-creditor Rights
  • Pleading Requirements
  • Contract Repuation
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1330

Ngwenya v Allied Builders Home Centre (Pty) Ltd (2022/18959)

Ngwenya v Allied Builders Home Centre (Pty) Ltd (2022/18959) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1330 (17 November 2023)

The court upheld an exception to a personal-injury particulars of claim for vagueness and non-compliance with Rule 18, and set the pleading aside with leave to amend.

  • Vague And Embarrassing Pleading
  • Personal Injury Claim
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Vague-and-embarrassing-pleading
  • Personal-injury-claims
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1000

VBS Financial Services (Pty) Ltd v Madhandzi (36120/21)

VBS Financial Services (Pty) Ltd v Madhandzi (36120/21) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1000 (7 September 2023)

The High Court dismissed an exception to a particulars of claim alleging unauthorised payments by a company director and breach of fiduciary duty.

  • Fiduciary Duty Of Directors
  • Undue Enrichment
  • Companies Act 71 Of 2008
  • Pleading Requirements
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Exception
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAFSHC 179

NTSU Building (Pty) Ltd v Member of the Executive Council of the Department of Human Settlements, Free State Province (4946/2013)

NTSU Building (Pty) Ltd v Member of the Executive Council of the Department of Human Settlements, Free State Province (4946/2013) [2023] ZAFSHC 179 (16 May 2023)

The High Court upheld an exception to an amended claim, finding the enrichment case against the first defendant was insufficiently pleaded and unclear.

  • Exception Procedure
  • Pleading Requirements
  • Unjustified Enrichment
  • Cause Of Action
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Exception-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 684

Gibela Rail Consortium RF (PTY) Ltd v Ndobe (4241/2020)

Gibela Rail Consortium RF (PTY) Ltd v Ndobe (4241/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 684 (14 September 2022)

The High Court dismissed an application to strike out amended particulars of claim, holding the respondent had complied with a prior order and the attack was premature.

  • Exception Procedure
  • Pleading Requirements
  • Defamation Claim
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAECGHC 31

Wesbank (a division of Firstrand Bank Ltd) v Mzotane (1778/2021)

Wesbank (a division of Firstrand Bank Ltd) v Mzotane (1778/2021) [2022] ZAECGHC 31 (24 March 2022)

The defendant's plea and counterclaim were found to be non-compliant with the Uniform Rules of Court, specifically failing to admit or deny material facts and lacking a clear and concise statement of the material facts relied upon. The defendant conceded that the pleadings were defective and required amendment. The court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, confirming that the High Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Magistrate's Court for claims within the monetary threshold. The defendant's conduct demonstrated disregard for the rules, and the opposition to the application was with…

  • Irregular Proceedings
  • Pleadings Non Compliance
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Counterclaim Requirements
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPPHC 99

Media t/a Daily Sun and Others v Sithole (38734/2020)

Media t/a Daily Sun and Others v Sithole (38734/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 99 (18 February 2022)

In a defamation action, the court partly upheld a Rule 30/Rule 23 challenge to the particulars of claim and ordered the plaintiff to amend key paragraphs.

  • Defamation
  • Pleadings Particularity
  • Vague And Embarrassing
  • Exception Procedure
  • Rule 18 Uniform Rules
  • Rule 23 Uniform Rules
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.