Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 729

S.P.M v L.M (Born M) (56859/2021)

S.P.M v L.M (Born M) (56859/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 729 (2 August 2024)

The High Court dismissed an application to rescind a bar-order dismissal and a divorce judgment, finding no good cause, no bona fide defence, and no Rule 42 basis.

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Rule 31 2 Default Judgment
  • Rule 42 1 A Error
  • Forfeiture Of Matrimonial Benefits
  • Divorce Proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 57

Tlhabanyane v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (122825/2023)

Tlhabanyane v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (122825/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 57 (29 January 2024)

Leave to appeal was refused after the court found no reasonable prospects of success on a Rule 27 bar-related application, delay explanations, or costs.

  • Notice Of Bar
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Default Judgment
  • Good Cause
  • Costs Award
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZANWHC 191

Minister of Police and Another v Lekgari (413/22)

Minister of Police and Another v Lekgari (413/22) [2023] ZANWHC 191 (17 October 2023)

The court condoned a late Rule 27 application and uplifted a procedural bar, allowing the defendants to file pleadings in a civil claim for damages.

  • Condonation
  • Removal Of Bar
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Default Judgment
  • Bona Fide Defence
  • Removal-of-bar
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZANWHC 72

Atlantic Oil Inland (Pty) Ltd v Calitz and Others (596/20)

Atlantic Oil Inland (Pty) Ltd v Calitz and Others (596/20) [2023] ZANWHC 72 (9 June 2023)

The High Court refused an application to lift a bar under Rule 27, finding the first defendant lacked locus standi to act for the Anja Trust.

  • Rule 27 Application
  • Locus Standi
  • Suretyship
  • Trust Litigation
  • Irregular Step
  • Default Judgment
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 604

Tshidzumba and Others v Special Investigation Unit and Others: In re: Special Investigation Unit v Maguvhe and Others (2020/10124)

Tshidzumba and Others v Special Investigation Unit and Others: In re: Special Investigation Unit v Maguvhe and Others (2020/10124) [2022] ZAGPJHC 604 (23 August 2022)

The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory or comprehensive explanation for the lengthy delay of approximately 14 months in seeking condonation to remove the bar. The applicants' reliance on the Rule 35(14) notice was unconvincing, as the bar was imposed before the notice and the requested report was provided. The applicants became aware of the bar in October 2020 but took no meaningful steps to address it, abandoning the Rule 30 procedure. The court held that no constitutional rights were infringed, as the applicants were not deprived of the opportunity to bring a t…

  • Condonation
  • Removal Of Bar
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Default Judgment
  • Prescription Act
  • Fiduciary Duties
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAFSHC 31

Central University of Technology V Lindsay Saker (Pty) Ltd, A division of Imperial Holdings (A125/2019)

Central University of Technology V Lindsay Saker (Pty) Ltd, A division of Imperial Holdings (A125/2019) [2020] ZAFSHC 31 (25 February 2020)

The High Court set aside a magistrate’s order enforcing a settlement, holding Rule 27(6)(a) did not allow judgment or an order of court on these facts.

  • Magistrates Court Jurisdiction
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Entry Of Judgment
  • Costs Order
  • Magistrates-court-rules
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAFSHC 71

R W v W M (3300/2018)

R W v W M (3300/2018) [2019] ZAFSHC 71 (30 May 2019)

High Court rescission application dismissed after finding the applicant was in wilful default and had not shown good cause to reopen the default judgment.

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Wilful Default
  • Bona Fide Defence
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Rescission-of-judgment
  • Wilful-default
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAECPEHC 9

Bouwer Collins Insurance Brokers (Pty) Ltd v Hopgood and Another (2012/12)

Bouwer Collins Insurance Brokers (Pty) Ltd v Hopgood and Another (2012/12) [2014] ZAECPEHC 9 (18 February 2014)

High Court dismissed an application to extend time to amend particulars of claim and dismissed the plaintiffs’ action for persistent procedural non-compliance.

  • Condonation
  • Extension Of Time
  • Irregular Steps
  • Dismissal Of Action
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2013] ZAGPPHC 247

Inter Africa Carriers CC v Show-Down Tradaing 16 CC t/a Kroondal Garage CC (65353/2011)

Inter Africa Carriers CC v Show-Down Tradaing 16 CC t/a Kroondal Garage CC (65353/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 247 (16 August 2013)

High Court dismissed an application to vary payment dates in a consent order and upheld a special plea of res judicata.

  • Variation Of Court Order
  • Res Judicata
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Consensual Settlement
  • Writ Of Execution
  • Rule-27
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2008] ZAWCHC 232

Espadon Marine (Pty) Ltd v Jik Abalone Farm (Pty) Ltd (15788/2007)

Espadon Marine (Pty) Ltd v Jik Abalone Farm (Pty) Ltd (15788/2007) [2008] ZAWCHC 232 (6 August 2008)

The High Court uplifted a notice of bar after finding a reasonable explanation for the delay and enough material to show a bona fide defence.

  • Notice Of Bar
  • Rule 27 Application
  • Default Judgment
  • Pleading Particularity
  • Notice-of-bar
  • Rule-27-application
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.