S.P.M v L.M (Born M) (56859/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 729 (2 August 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
56859/2021
Judge
Gwala AJ
The High Court dismissed an application to rescind a bar-order dismissal and a divorce judgment, finding no good cause, no bona fide defence, and no Rule 42 basis.
Tlhabanyane v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (122825/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 57 (29 January 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
122825/2023
Judge
de Vos
Leave to appeal was refused after the court found no reasonable prospects of success on a Rule 27 bar-related application, delay explanations, or costs.
Tshidzumba and Others v Special Investigation Unit and Others: In re: Special Investigation Unit v Maguvhe and Others (2020/10124) [2022] ZAGPJHC 604 (23 August 2022)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2020/10124
Judge
Strydom
The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory or comprehensive explanation for the lengthy delay of approximately 14 months in seeking condonation to remove the bar. The applicants' reliance on the Rule 35(14) notice was unconvincing, as the bar was imposed before the notice and the requested report was provided. The applicants became aware of the bar in October 2020 but took no meaningful steps to address it, abandoning the Rule 30 procedure. The court held that no constitutional rights were infringed, as the applicants were not deprived of the opportunity to bring a t…
Central University of Technology V Lindsay Saker (Pty) Ltd, A division of Imperial Holdings (A125/2019) [2020] ZAFSHC 31 (25 February 2020)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A125/2019
Judges
Reinders, Mhlambi
The High Court set aside a magistrate’s order enforcing a settlement, holding Rule 27(6)(a) did not allow judgment or an order of court on these facts.
R W v W M (3300/2018) [2019] ZAFSHC 71 (30 May 2019)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
3300/2018
Judge
P.E. Molitsoane
High Court rescission application dismissed after finding the applicant was in wilful default and had not shown good cause to reopen the default judgment.
Bouwer Collins Insurance Brokers (Pty) Ltd v Hopgood and Another (2012/12) [2014] ZAECPEHC 9 (18 February 2014)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number
2012/12
Judge
E Revelas
High Court dismissed an application to extend time to amend particulars of claim and dismissed the plaintiffs’ action for persistent procedural non-compliance.