Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1318

Ngubane Zeelie Inc v Labat Africa Ltd and Others (206205/2013)

Ngubane Zeelie Inc v Labat Africa Ltd and Others (206205/2013) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1318 (15 November 2023)

Leave to appeal was granted only on the disputed judgment amount, after the court found the award had been miscalculated. Leave was refused on the merits.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Judgment Amount Dispute
  • Rule 42 Correction
  • Attorney And Client Costs
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Judgment-amount-dispute
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 859

Stevens and Another v Road Accident Fund (26017/2016)

Stevens and Another v Road Accident Fund (26017/2016) [2022] ZAGPJHC 859 (1 November 2022)

The High Court corrected an earlier order under Rule 42 to reflect a 15% contingency deduction, confirm 100% liability, and restate the damages, interest, and costs.

  • Loss Of Support
  • Contingency Deduction
  • Rule 42 Correction
  • Mora Interest
  • Rule-42-correction
  • Loss-of-support
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2014] ZAGPPHC 1044

B.J.V.D.W v M.V.D.W (18890/13)

B.J.V.D.W v M.V.D.W (18890/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1044 (9 December 2014)

The court granted a Rule 42 correction of a divorce order, fixing obvious omissions and a maintenance date error, and dismissed leave to appeal with costs.

  • Maintenance Variation
  • Rehabilitative Maintenance
  • Rule 42 Correction
  • Divorce Order
  • Functus Officio
  • Rule-42
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2011] ZAWCHC 236

Dijkstra v Brinkhuis (16193/2008)

Dijkstra v Brinkhuis (16193/2008) [2011] ZAWCHC 236 (25 May 2011)

The High Court refused leave to appeal in a divorce and maintenance dispute, corrected an omitted divorce decree under Rule 42, and ordered costs against the respondent.

  • Divorce
  • Maintenance
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rule 42 Correction
  • Rule 43 Interim Orders
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2005] ZAGPHC 133

NM and Others v Smith and Others (24948/02)

NM and Others v Smith and Others (24948/02) [2005] ZAGPHC 133 (22 August 2005)

The High Court refused leave to appeal, finding no reasonable prospect of a different outcome, but corrected the order to include interest on damages.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Reasonable Prospect Of Success
  • Interest On Damages
  • Rule 42 Correction
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Reasonable-prospect-of-success
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.