Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZALMPPHC 87

OSZ Tayob Trading Pietersburg (Pty) Ltd t/a EH Hassim v Ramusi and Others (4307/2022)

OSZ Tayob Trading Pietersburg (Pty) Ltd t/a EH Hassim v Ramusi and Others (4307/2022) [2025] ZALMPPHC 87 (6 May 2025)

The High Court declared two immovable properties specially executable to satisfy a judgment debt, rejecting non-joinder and estate-administration objections.

  • Declaration Of Executability
  • Joinder
  • Administration Of Estates Act
  • Rule 46a Uniform Rules
  • Sale In Execution
  • Rule-46a
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2021] ZAGPPHC 328

ABSA Bank Limited v L.G.C and Another (4631/2011)

ABSA Bank Limited v L.G.C and Another (4631/2011) [2021] ZAGPPHC 328 (27 May 2021)

The court found that the second respondent's settlement agreement with the first respondent created only a personal right to claim transfer of the property, not a real right of ownership. Ownership of immovable property in South Africa is transferred only by registration in the Deeds Office, as required by section 16 of the Deeds Registries Act. The property remained registered in the name of the first respondent, who was legally competent to mortgage it. The second respondent did not take steps to register the property in her name, nor was the settlement agreement made an order of court. The…

  • Deeds Registries Act
  • Mortgage Bond Execution
  • Ownership Transfer
  • Rule 46a Uniform Rules
  • Personal Right Vs Real Right
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAMPMHC 12

Firstrand Bank Limited v Mgedesi and Another (727/2016)

Firstrand Bank Limited v Mgedesi and Another (727/2016) [2019] ZAMPMHC 12 (5 June 2019)

The court held that a tenant occupying property subject to execution does not have a direct and substantial legal interest in proceedings to declare the property executable where the property is not the primary residence of the judgment debtor. The tenant's rights to occupation are protected under the PIE Act and Section 26 of the Constitution, which require a separate eviction process. Service of the application on the tenant is sufficient, and joinder is not required unless the tenant can demonstrate a direct and material interest in the litigation. The court distinguished the Schuurman jud…

  • Warrant Of Execution
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Rule 46a Uniform Rules
  • Primary Residence
  • Section 26 Constitution
  • Prevention Of Illegal Eviction Act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.