Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 797

Khoza v First Rand Bank Limited: In re: First Rand Bank Limited v Khoza (21311/2017)

Khoza v First Rand Bank Limited: In re: First Rand Bank Limited v Khoza (21311/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 797 (12 October 2022)

The court dismissed an application for leave to appeal because it had not been prosecuted and did not set out grounds of appeal, awarding costs against the applicant.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Non Prosecution Of Appeal
  • Costs Order
  • Rule 49 Compliance
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Non-prosecution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 381

Figures and CO (Pty) Ltd and Others v Urban Real Estate (Pty) Ltd (2021/45109)

Figures and CO (Pty) Ltd and Others v Urban Real Estate (Pty) Ltd (2021/45109) [2022] ZAGPJHC 381 (6 June 2022)

The High Court dismissed leave to appeal, holding the appeal had lapsed for non-compliance with Rule 49(6)(a), ending the suspension of the eviction order.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Suspension Of Execution
  • Rule 49 Compliance
  • Eviction Proceedings
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Rule-49-compliance
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAGPPHC 292

HBZ Bank Limited v Mukudam's General Enterprises and Others (32628/2019)

HBZ Bank Limited v Mukudam's General Enterprises and Others (32628/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 292 (1 June 2020)

The court found that the defendants' notice of application for leave to appeal did not comply with Rule 49(1)(b) as it failed to set out any grounds upon which the application was based. The notice was vague and did not inform the court or the respondent of the case to be met. Aligning with the precedent in Songono v Minister of Law and Order, the court held the application to be fatally defective. Even if the application were not defective, the court found no reasonable prospects of success as the defendants did not raise any material facts or triable issues in their opposition to summary ju…

  • Summary Judgment
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rule 49 Compliance
  • Costs Order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] ZAWCHC 184

Kloof Investments 2004 CC v Isaacs (A900/2010)

Kloof Investments 2004 CC v Isaacs (A900/2010) [2011] ZAWCHC 184 (25 March 2011)

The court struck the appeal from the roll because no notice of appeal was delivered under Rule 49(2), and no condonation or extension was sought.

  • Notice Of Appeal Requirements
  • Setoff In Landlord Tenant Disputes
  • Lease Cancellation
  • Rule 49 Compliance
  • Notice-of-appeal
  • Rule-49
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.