M. v Haywood N.O and Others (15781/15) [2024] ZAGPPHC 437 (29 April 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
15781/15
Judge
Malatsi-Teffo
The High Court confirmed a rule nisi, allowing re-enrolment of divorce-related claims and maintenance enforcement, including deductions from a retirement annuity.
Sinbu Industrial Properties (Pty) Ltd v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Others (2019/76101) [2021] ZAGPPHC 658 (8 September 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2019/76101
Judge
Mokose
The High Court allowed an application to amend a public right-of-way servitude over property in Pretoria and held the municipal ordinance was not triggered.
Nkala and Others (2018/44060), Ex parte [2018] ZAGPJHC 657 (13 December 2018)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2018/44060
Judge
P. M. Mojapelo
The High Court certified four settlement classes in the Nkala class action, appointed class representatives and lawyers, and issued a rule nisi on the settlement agreement.
Arvum Exports (Pty) Ltd and Others v Costa NO (18979/2013) [2013] ZAWCHC 176 (20 November 2013)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
18979/2013
Judge
A.G. Binns-Ward
The court held that the applicants' contempt application was procedurally defective, as it did not comply with the requirements for urgent applications under the Uniform Rules and Practice Notes. The use of a rule nisi and the involvement of the court for directions were unnecessary, given that no interim relief was sought and the urgency was not objectively justified. The proper procedure would have been to set their own timetable, allowing the respondents reasonable time to answer, and to enrol the matter on the semi-urgent roll. The court found that the applicants' approach imposed unwarra…