Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 816

Cronje and Another v Forgeweld Engineering (Pty) Ltd and Others (96943/2016)

Cronje and Another v Forgeweld Engineering (Pty) Ltd and Others (96943/2016) [2024] ZAGPPHC 816 (22 August 2024)

The court found that the applicants failed to meet the requirements for rescission under both Rule 42(1)(a) and the common law. Their absence was elected, not precluded, and they were given proper notice of the proceedings. The explanation provided for their default and the delay in bringing the rescission application was neither reasonable nor satisfactory. The alleged fraud was not substantiated to the high threshold required, as the facts relied upon were merely belated defences and not deliberate misrepresentations. The voluntary surrender proceedings did not suspend legal action, and the…

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Default Judgment
  • Fraud In Civil Proceedings
  • Sales In Execution
  • Voluntary Surrender
  • Locus Standi
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 722

Sunrise Technologies (PTY) Ltd v Friedshelf 422 (PTY) Ltd and Others (2022-17784)

Sunrise Technologies (PTY) Ltd v Friedshelf 422 (PTY) Ltd and Others (2022-17784) [2022] ZAGPJHC 722 (20 September 2022)

The High Court granted an urgent interdict over advertising signs sold in execution, finding non-compliance with Rule 45(3) and unlawful interference with customer contracts.

  • Sales In Execution
  • Interdict
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Rule 45 Uniform Rules
  • Contractual Interference
  • Sales-in-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2004] ZAECHC 19

Shoprite Checkers Ltd t/a Megasave v Khan and another (ECJ 2004/007)

Shoprite Checkers Ltd t/a Megasave v Khan and another (ECJ 2004/007) [2004] ZAECHC 19 (8 July 2004)

Full bench appeal on execution sale conditions. The court held clause 20, requiring bondholder consent after auction, conflicted with Rule 46 and was invalid.

  • Sales In Execution
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 46
  • Suspensive Conditions
  • Contract Severability
  • Public Auction Procedure
  • Sales-in-execution
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.