Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
9 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZAMPMHC 33

Janse Van Rensburg v S (Bail Appeal) (BA02/2025; SA158/2024)

Janse Van Rensburg v S (Bail Appeal) (BA02/2025; SA158/2024) [2025] ZAMPMHC 33 (23 June 2025)

The High Court dismissed a bail appeal, finding the appellant failed to show the interests of justice permitted release and remained a flight risk.

  • Bail Application
  • Flight Risk
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 355

Mokgetsi v S (Bail Appeal) (A34/2025)

Mokgetsi v S (Bail Appeal) (A34/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 355 (14 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed a bail appeal by an accused charged with rape, holding that the magistrate correctly applied the interests-of-justice test under the CPA.

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Presumption Of Innocence
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Bail-application
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZANWHC 251

Motshelanoka v S (Bail Appeal) (CAB15/2024)

Motshelanoka v S (Bail Appeal) (CAB15/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 251 (9 October 2024)

The High Court dismissed a bail appeal in a murder matter, holding that the appellant had not shown that the interests of justice permitted release.

  • Bail Application
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 60
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Appeal On New Facts
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZAWCHC 243

Makobalo v S (A138/2024)

Makobalo v S (A138/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 243 (16 August 2024)

The court found that the magistrate erred by failing to individually assess the appellant's role in the offence and his personal circumstances. The appellant's involvement in the attack was minimal compared to his co-accused, and he did not participate in the intimidation of witnesses or the release of threatening social media content. The appellant is a first offender, still in school, and has no prior convictions or pending matters. The magistrate relied too heavily on group conduct and did not adequately engage with the appellant's affidavit or seek further clarification regarding his circ…

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Personal Circumstances
  • Interests Of Justice
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZAGPJHC 614

Ismail v S (A60/2024)

Ismail v S (A60/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 614 (4 July 2024)

The court found that the appellant failed to discharge the onus that the interests of justice permit her release on bail. The appellant's conduct, including providing false addresses, evading police tracing efforts, and her familiarity with witnesses and access to evidentiary material, created a real likelihood that she would attempt to evade trial and interfere with the administration of justice if released. The gravity of the charges and the value of the stolen goods further incentivized absconding. The evidence presented by the appellant and her mother was inconsistent and lacked credibili…

  • Bail Application
  • Fraud
  • Theft
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Schedule 5 Offence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZAECMKHC 59

Williams v S (CA&R 92/2024)

Williams v S (CA&R 92/2024) [2024] ZAECMKHC 59 (12 June 2024)

High Court bail appeal upheld after the magistrate failed to weigh the appellant’s minor children’s interests and did not properly deal with alleged witness intimidation.

  • Bail Application
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Interests Of Minor Children
  • Witness Intimidation
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZALMPPHC 53

Matambo v S (BA15/2024)

Matambo v S (BA15/2024) [2024] ZALMPPHC 53 (24 May 2024)

High Court appeal against refusal of bail dismissed. The court held the appellant had not shown that the interests of justice permitted release.

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Flight Risk
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZANCHC 43

Van Zyl and Others v S (CA & R 7/2024)

Van Zyl and Others v S (CA & R 7/2024) [2024] ZANCHC 43 (3 May 2024)

The Court found that the Magistrate correctly exercised his discretion in refusing bail. The appellants failed to discharge the onus to show that the interests of justice permit their release. The presence of pending theft cases for the first and third appellants, the second appellant's previous convictions for dishonesty, and the circumstances of the alleged offence indicated a likelihood of further offences and undermining the bail system. The Magistrate's conclusion was supported by the evidence and legal principles, and the denial of bail was manifestly in the interests of justice. The ap…

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Appeal Discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAFSHC 435

Magudumana v S - Appeal (A156/2023)

Magudumana v S - Appeal (A156/2023) [2023] ZAFSHC 435 (7 November 2023)

High Court appeal dismissed against refusal of bail to Nandipha Magudumana, with the court finding a real flight risk and no material misdirection by the magistrate.

  • Bail Application
  • Flight Risk
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Corruption
  • Criminal Procedure Act
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAWCHC 320

Imran v S (A112/2023)

Imran v S (A112/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 320 (7 November 2023)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against refusal of bail, finding the magistrate had not misdirected herself and that the interests of justice did not permit release.

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Interest Of Justice
  • Flight Risk
  • White Collar Crime
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.