Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2020] ZANCHC 59

Hoeskool Martin Oosthuzen v April (CA&R 67/2019)

Hoeskool Martin Oosthuzen v April (CA&R 67/2019) [2020] ZANCHC 59 (3 July 2020)

The High Court upheld an appeal against refusal of default judgment and granted judgment for outstanding school fees, interest, and costs.

  • Default Judgment
  • School Fees Liability
  • Magistrates Court Rules
  • Exemption From School Fees
  • Default-judgment
  • School-fees
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZANCHC 42

Hoerskool Martin Oosthuizen v April (CA & R 67/2019)

Hoerskool Martin Oosthuizen v April (CA & R 67/2019) [2020] ZANCHC 42 (15 June 2020)

The High Court upheld an appeal against refusal of default judgment for unpaid school fees and granted judgment for the outstanding balance, interest, and costs.

  • Default Judgment
  • School Fees Liability
  • Magistrates Court Rules
  • Exemption From School Fees
  • Default-judgment
  • School-fees
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPPHC 171

Doringkloof Primary School v Tshiguvho and Another (A383/2018)

Doringkloof Primary School v Tshiguvho and Another (A383/2018) [2019] ZAGPPHC 171 (30 May 2019)

The High Court found that the Magistrates Court erred in refusing default judgment. The appellant's particulars of claim and supporting affidavit established that the agreement and statutory obligations arose within the district, satisfying jurisdictional requirements under section 28(1)(d) of the Magistrates' Court Act. The court distinguished Buys v Roodt, noting no facts suggested payment or performance occurred outside the district. The appellant was not required to plead the place of performance beyond the facts already alleged. Failure to comply with Rule 5(6) did not prejudice the resp…

  • Magistrates Court Jurisdiction
  • Default Judgment
  • School Fees Liability
  • Specific Performance
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2017] ZASCA 187

Head of Department Western Cape Education Department and Others v S (1209/2016)

Head of Department Western Cape Education Department and Others v S (1209/2016) [2017] ZASCA 187; [2018] 1 All SA 640 (SCA); 2018 (2) SA 418 (SCA) (13 December 2017)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 40(1) of the South African Schools Act imposes joint and several liability on biological parents for the payment of school fees at public fee-paying schools. However, the Act and Regulations must be interpreted and applied to ensure that single, separated, or divorced parents are able to apply for fee exemptions based on their own financial circumstances when the other parent refuses or fails to provide income information. The Regulations provide for conditional exemptions in such cases, and schools and governing bodies must process applications a…

  • School Fees Liability
  • Fee Exemption Regulations
  • Right To Basic Education
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Administrative Review
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAECGHC 127

Tee v Collegiate High School for Girls (CA100/2016)

Tee v Collegiate High School for Girls (CA100/2016) [2016] ZAECGHC 127 (11 November 2016)

The court held that section 40 of the Schools Act does not create joint and several liability for school fees between parents; rather, liability is joint unless otherwise expressly stated. Therefore, both the appellant and her former husband should have been joined as co-defendants. The appellant's defence of lis alibi pendens was valid, as another action for the same debt was pending. The appellant provided sufficient material facts and documentary evidence to establish a bona fide defence regarding exemption from school fees. The Magistrate's Court erred in granting summary judgment without…

  • Summary Judgment
  • Non Joinder
  • Lis Alibi Pendens
  • School Fees Liability
  • Exemption From School Fees
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2014] ZAGPPHC 588

C.F.N v K.G.N (14/29348)

C.F.N v K.G.N (14/29348) [2014] ZAGPPHC 588 (23 July 2014)

Interim Rule 43 relief regulated child care, contact, and maintenance pending divorce, with primary residence to the respondent and detailed financial orders.

  • Rule 43 Interim Relief
  • Spousal Maintenance
  • Child Custody
  • Parental Responsibilities
  • Alcohol Testing
  • School Fees Liability
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2012] ZAFSHC 137

Meeding v Hoer Tegniese Skool Sasolburg (A134/2011)

Meeding v Hoer Tegniese Skool Sasolburg (A134/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 137 (2 August 2012)

The Free State High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal in a school-fees dispute, finding no reasonable prospect of success and ordering costs.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • School Fees Liability
  • Costs Orders
  • Divorce Decree Interpretation
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • School-fees-liability
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2011] ZAWCHC 336

Pellissier v Pellissier (A564/2010)

Pellissier v Pellissier (A564/2010) [2011] ZAWCHC 336 (25 July 2011)

High Court family appeal dismissed: the court upheld only a limited maintenance writ, found no basis to vary joint decision-making, and made no costs order.

  • Maintenance Obligations
  • Variation Of Divorce Order
  • Warrant Of Execution
  • School Fees Liability
  • Joint Decision Making
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2010] ZAECGHC 69

T.S (born C) v R.J.S (EL 276/2010)

T.S (born C) v R.J.S (EL 276/2010) [2010] ZAECGHC 69 (19 August 2010)

Rule 43 interim-relief application in a divorce matter involving a minor child, medical aid, school expenses, and costs. The court ordered joint caregiving and split certain financial responsibilities.

  • Rule 43 Interim Relief
  • Maintenance Pendente Lite
  • Joint Caregivers
  • Medical Aid Benefits
  • School Fees Liability
  • Rule-43-interim-relief
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2008] ZANCHC 18

Bestuursraad van Laerskool Sentraal,Kakamas v Sersant van Kradenburg and Another (CA &R 52/07)

Bestuursraad van Laerskool Sentraal,Kakamas v Sersant van Kradenburg and Another (CA &R 52/07) [2008] ZANCHC 18 (4 April 2008)

The High Court held that a non-custodial biological father of an extramarital child is not a “parent” liable for school fees under section 40(1) of the Schools Act.

  • School Fees Liability
  • Parental Authority
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Maintenance Orders
  • School-fees-liability
  • Parental-authority
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.