Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax Law [2025] ZATC 3

Flower v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 25209)

Flower v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 25209) [2025] ZATC 3 (3 February 2025)

The Tax Court held that SARS’s rule 31 statement impermissibly novated the assessment, allowed Flower’s pre-trade development fees, and rejected ring-fencing.

  • Pre Trade Expenditure
  • Deductibility Of Development Fees
  • Section 11a Income Tax Act
  • Section 24j Income Tax Act
  • Rule 31 Tax Court
  • Ring Fencing
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2018] ZATC 1

S G Taxpayer v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT14264)

S G Taxpayer v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT14264) [2018] ZATC 1; 81 SATC 308 (9 May 2018)

The court found that the taxpayer's dominant purpose in making the R48 million contribution to the Trust was to incentivise and retain key management staff, thereby enhancing the taxpayer's income-producing capacity. The scheme was structured so that employees benefited from the growth in the holding company's shares, and the contribution was not repaid to the taxpayer. The evidence established a sufficiently close causal link between the expenditure and the taxpayer's income-producing operations. The court distinguished the present case from Solaglass, as the expenditure was not for the bene…

  • Income Tax Deduction
  • Employee Share Incentive Scheme
  • Production Of Income
  • Section 11a Income Tax Act
  • Group Company Expenditure
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2003] ZASCA 59

Warner Lambert SA (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (277/02)

Warner Lambert SA (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (277/02) [2003] ZASCA 59; 2003 (5) SA 344 (SCA); 65 SATC 346 (30 May 2003)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that socially responsible expenditure incurred to protect a subsidiary’s trading position was deductible as revenue expenditure.

  • Income Tax Deduction
  • Capital Vs Revenue Expenditure
  • Purpose Of Expenditure
  • Section 11a Income Tax Act
  • Section 23g Income Tax Act
  • Income-tax-deduction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.