Rudolph and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (35697/08)
Rudolph and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another (35697/08) [2009] ZAGPJHC 44 (18 August 2009)
The application was dismissed because section 179(5)(d) of the Constitution did not apply to the decisions made by the DPP, as the NDPP was not involved. The applicants were not entitled to make representations prior to the decision to re-prosecute. The challenge based on alleged non-compliance with the Policy Manual failed due to lack of substance and absence of demonstrated prejudice. The argument regarding unlawful arrest was not supported by the founding papers and was considered an afterthought. The evidence provided by the respondents was relevant and did not prejudice the applicants. T…
Source excerpt
- Prosecutorial Discretion
- Section 179 Constitution
- Policy Manual Compliance
- Unlawful Arrest
- Review Of Prosecutorial Decisions