Hlako and Others v S (Appeal) (AA02/2024)
Hlako and Others v S (Appeal) (AA02/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 88 (30 April 2025)
The appeal court found that the trial court correctly convicted the appellants based on the direct, primary evidence provided by Gabriel and Matome, whose statements and testimonies were corroborated in all material respects. The alleged contradictions and inconsistencies raised by the appellants were either immaterial or attributable to the passage of time and did not undermine the central narrative of the prosecution's case. The court held that the defence failed to present any credible exculpatory evidence and that the trial court properly applied the principles governing the assessment of…
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Kidnapping
- Defeating The Ends Of Justice
- Assessment Of Witness Credibility
- Contradictory Evidence
- Section 204 Witnesses