Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2011] ZASCA 126

Emergency Care Training Association v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (664/10)

Emergency Care Training Association v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (664/10) [2011] ZASCA 126 (9 September 2011)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal because undertakings made the relief unnecessary and any decision would have no practical effect.

  • Practical Effect Of Relief
  • Costs Award
  • Section 21a Supreme Court Act
  • Practical-effect
  • Appeal-dismissed
  • Costs-order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] ZASCA 91

South African Police Service Medical Scheme ( (2011 (4) SA 456 (SCA))

South African Police Service Medical Scheme ( (2011 (4) SA 456 (SCA)) [2011] ZASCA 91; 542/10 (31 May 2011)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed a medical scheme appeal as moot after rule amendments made the payment dispute academic.

  • Medical Schemes Act
  • Interpretation Of Scheme Rules
  • Practical Effect Of Appeal
  • Costs Award
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Section 21a Supreme Court Act
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2007] ZANCHC 2

MEC, Northern Cape Provincial Government: Department of Education v Bateleur Books (Pty) Ltd and Others (1304/06)

MEC, Northern Cape Provincial Government: Department of Education v Bateleur Books (Pty) Ltd and Others (1304/06) [2007] ZANCHC 2 (11 May 2007)

The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal, holding the dispute moot because the procurement process had already ended and no practical effect would follow.

  • Mootness
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Section 21a Supreme Court Act
  • Procurement Process
  • Costs Orders
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2003] ZASCA 22

Rand Water Board v Rotek Industries (Pty) Ltd (199/2002)

Rand Water Board v Rotek Industries (Pty) Ltd (199/2002) [2003] ZASCA 22; 2003 (4) SA 58 (SCA) (26 March 2003)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal under section 21A because the dispute had become academic after a servitude was registered.

  • Expropriation
  • Servitude Registration
  • Practical Effect Of Judgment
  • Section 21a Supreme Court Act
  • Practical-effect-of-judgment
  • Academic-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.