Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2010] ZACT 39

Competition Commission v Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others, In re: Competition Commission v Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others (103/CR/Sep08)

Competition Commission v Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others, In re: Competition Commission v Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others (103/CR/Sep08) [2010] ZACT 39; [2010] 1 CPLR 174 (CT) (8 June 2010)

The Tribunal held that the Competition Commission is not required to specify all respondents at the time of initiating a complaint under section 49B(1). The Act requires only that the Commission initiate a complaint against an alleged prohibited practice, with a rational link to the relevant prohibition. The Commission's initiation documents and subsequent investigation satisfied the jurisdictional requirements for referral against Feltex, Steinhoff, and Kap. The Tribunal adopted a purposive approach, emphasizing the public interest in prosecuting anti-competitive conduct and avoiding a mecha…

  • Initiation Of Complaint
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Amendment Of Referral
  • Section 4 Horizontal Practices
  • Section 49b Initiation
  • Section 67 Limitation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.