S v Ndondo (971/2006)
S v Ndondo (971/2006) [2006] ZAFSHC 158 (19 October 2006)
The accused did not unequivocally admit that his driving faculties were impaired by alcohol, which is an essential element of the offence under section 65(1) of Act No. 93/1996. The magistrate's reliance on the accused's ambiguous answer and the mere fact of alcohol consumption and smell was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that inferential reasoning is not permitted under section 112(1)(b) and that the accused's admissions did not sustain the conviction. The conviction and sentence were set aside, and the matter was remitted for further questioning to p…
Source excerpt
- Driving Under Influence
- Section 65 Road Traffic Act
- Section 112 1 B Criminal Procedure Act
- Admission Of Elements
- Impaired Driving Faculties