Competition Commission v Media 24 (pty) Ltd (92/CR/Oct11) [2013] ZACT 19; [2013] 1 CPLR 291 (CT) (28 March 2013)
Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
92/CR/Oct11
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andreas Wessels
The Tribunal allowed the Commission’s amendment, but ordered further particulars on Vista’s alleged targeting conduct and rejected objections on cause of action and contradiction.
Bosch and Another v Commissioner of South African Revenue Services (A 94/2012) [2012] ZAWCHC 188; [2013] 2 All SA 41 (WCC); 2013 (5) SA 130 (WCC); 75 SATC 1 (20 November 2012)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A 94/2012
Judges
Davis, Baartman, Waglay
The Court held that the scheme agreements created unconditional sales upon exercise of the option, and that section 8A was triggered at that point, not upon delivery of shares. The various clauses in the scheme, including those relating to continued employment and the stop loss provision, did not constitute suspensive conditions that would defer the creation of the right to acquire shares. The Court found that the scheme had clear commercial purpose and was not a simulated transaction. Accordingly, paragraph 2(a) of the Seventh Schedule was excluded by the proviso, and section 8C did not appl…