Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2021] ZAECGHC 9

SKG Africa (Pty) Ltd v Eastern Cape Rural and Others (EL1153/2019)

SKG Africa (Pty) Ltd v Eastern Cape Rural and Others (EL1153/2019) [2021] ZAECGHC 9 (12 January 2021)

The court granted leave to amend a reviewing party’s notice of motion and rule 16A notice, finding no new cause of action or incurable prejudice.

  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Constitutional Invalidity
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Ultra Vires
  • Section 9 Equality
  • Section 22 Right To Trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZACC 13

Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust and Others (CCT109/19)

Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust and Others (CCT109/19) [2020] ZACC 13; 2020 (5) SA 247 (CC); 2020 (9) BCLR 1098 (CC) (17 June 2020)

The majority held that the applicants failed to discharge the onus of demonstrating that enforcement of the lease renewal clauses would be contrary to public policy. The renewal clauses were clear, simple, and understandable, and the applicants did not provide a sufficient explanation for their failure to comply. The harsh outcome of eviction and business collapse, absent such explanation, was not enough to render enforcement contrary to public policy. The court reaffirmed that public policy is informed by constitutional values, but that abstract notions of fairness, reasonableness, and good…

  • Public Policy In Contract
  • Pacta Sunt Servanda
  • Section 9 Equality
  • Black Economic Empowerment
  • Contractual Fairness
  • Ubuntu
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2013] ZASCA 118

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others v Law Society of the Northern Provinces (005/13)

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others v Law Society of the Northern Provinces (005/13) [2013] ZASCA 118; [2013] 11 BLLR 1057 (SCA); [2014] 1 All SA 125 (SCA); 2014 (2) SA 321 (SCA); (2013) 34 ILJ 2779 (SCA) (20 September 2013)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that rule 25(1)(c) of the CCMA rules, which limits the right to legal representation in arbitration proceedings concerning dismissals for misconduct or incapacity, is not unconstitutional. The rule is rationally connected to the legitimate government purpose of providing speedy, inexpensive, and informal dispute resolution for unfair dismissals. The limitation is the product of a historical compromise among social partners and is consistent with the Constitution. There is no absolute right to legal representation in administrative tribunals, and the subrule pr…

  • Legal Representation In Ccma
  • Rationality Review
  • Section 9 Equality
  • Section 22 Freedom Of Trade
  • Section 34 Access To Court
  • Administrative Action
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.