Nedbank Limited v Sana Developers (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/080710)
Nedbank Limited v Sana Developers (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/080710) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1087 (23 October 2024)
The court found that Sana Developers failed to meet the jurisdictional requirement of reasonable prospects for rescue. The business rescue plan was generic, lacked detail, and relied on assets over which Nedbank held security. The practitioner failed to comply with statutory timelines and requirements, and the purported suspension of Nedbank's rights was impermissible. Nedbank, as the majority creditor and judgment holder, was entitled to enforce its rights. The only viable means to settle the debt was liquidation, not business rescue. The court dismissed the jurisdictional challenge and foun…
Source excerpt
- Business Rescue
- Companies Act 71 Of 2008
- Secured Creditor Rights
- Liquidation Proceedings
- Condonation Of Late Filing