Asmal v Essa (38/2013)
Asmal v Essa (38/2013) [2014] ZASCA 62; [2014] 3 All SA 115 (SCA); 2016 (1) SA 95 (SCA) (14 May 2014)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the loan arrangements were not credit agreements under the National Credit Act, so provisional sentence on the cheques was competent.
- National Credit Act
- Provisional Sentence
- Secured Loans
- Cheque Liability
- Consumer Protection
- National-credit-act