Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2014] ZAGPPHC 303

Pather and Another v Financial Services Board and Others (57617/10)

Pather and Another v Financial Services Board and Others (57617/10) [2014] ZAGPPHC 303; [2014] 3 All SA 208 (GP); 2014 (9) BCLR 1082 (GP) (20 March 2014)

The court held that the Enforcement Committee had jurisdiction to impose administrative penalties for contraventions of section 76 of the Securities Services Act, 36 of 2004, as the Act's provisions for administrative penalties operate independently of the criminal jurisdiction conferred on the High Court and Regional Court by section 79. The transitional provisions of section 78(4) of the 2008 Amendment Act preserved the Committee's jurisdiction for investigations and proceedings pending or instituted before the amendments took effect, including the applicants' matter. The Committee was enti…

  • Securities Regulation
  • Administrative Penalties
  • Jurisdiction Of Statutory Bodies
  • Standard Of Proof
  • Constitutional Review
  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2012] ZASCA 114

Donald & Richard Currie (Pty) Ltd v Growthpoint Properties Ltd (572/11)

Donald & Richard Currie (Pty) Ltd v Growthpoint Properties Ltd (572/11) [2012] ZASCA 114 (13 September 2012)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appellants were bound by their acceptance forms, which clearly elected cash despite their claimed mistakes.

  • Contract Acceptance
  • Iustus Error
  • Company Takeover
  • Securities Regulation
  • Contract-acceptance
  • Mistake
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2000] ZASCA 1

Sefalana Employee Benefits Organisation v Haslam and Others (553/97)

Sefalana Employee Benefits Organisation v Haslam and Others (553/97) [2000] ZASCA 1; 2000 (2) SA 415 (SCA); [2000] JOL 6205 (A) (3 March 2000)

The court held that no mandatory takeover offer arose because the share transaction was repudiated and never implemented, so control never changed.

  • Takeover Regulation
  • Mandatory Offer
  • Minority Shareholder Rights
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Securities Regulation
  • Takeover-regulation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.