Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2018] ZANCHC 57

Nogoli v S (CA & R 8/2018)

Nogoli v S (CA & R 8/2018) [2018] ZANCHC 57 (18 June 2018)

On appeal, the High Court set aside a life sentence for rape and replaced it with 15 years’ imprisonment after finding sentencing misdirections.

  • Rape
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Sentencing Disproportionality
  • Juvenile Victim
  • Appeal Against Sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2011] ZASCA 215

Abram de Sousa v S (334/11)

Abram de Sousa v S (334/11) [2011] ZASCA 215 (29 November 2011)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the high court erred by granting leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal instead of to itself, as the statutory scheme requires appeals from lower courts to be heard first by the high court. The central issue was whether the appellant had reasonable prospects of success on appeal against his convictions and sentences. The court found that the complainant's evidence, as a single witness, was challenged on several grounds, including contradictions and lack of corroboration, and that the expert evidence regarding her truthfulness was arguably inadmiss…

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Reasonable Prospects Of Success
  • Indecent Assault
  • Rape
  • Cautionary Rule
  • Sentencing Disproportionality
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2010] ZAECGHC 113

S v Kali

S v Kali [2010] ZAECGHC 113 (25 November 2010)

The court found that the prescribed minimum sentence of 15 years imprisonment for both robbery with aggravating circumstances and unlawful possession of a semi-automatic firearm was manifestly unjust and disproportionate given the appellant's youth, first offender status, and the factual background of the offences. The appellant's acquisition of the firearm was accidental, the robbery was spontaneous, and there was no evidence of serious harm to the victim. The magistrate erred in failing to give sufficient weight to these mitigating circumstances. Consequently, the sentences were set aside a…

  • Minimum Sentence Provisions
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Unlawful Possession Of Firearm
  • Sentencing Disproportionality
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.