Abram de Sousa v S (334/11) [2011] ZASCA 215 (29 November 2011)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
334/11
Judges
Harms, Shongwe, Plasket
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the high court erred by granting leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal instead of to itself, as the statutory scheme requires appeals from lower courts to be heard first by the high court. The central issue was whether the appellant had reasonable prospects of success on appeal against his convictions and sentences. The court found that the complainant's evidence, as a single witness, was challenged on several grounds, including contradictions and lack of corroboration, and that the expert evidence regarding her truthfulness was arguably inadmiss…
The court found that the prescribed minimum sentence of 15 years imprisonment for both robbery with aggravating circumstances and unlawful possession of a semi-automatic firearm was manifestly unjust and disproportionate given the appellant's youth, first offender status, and the factual background of the offences. The appellant's acquisition of the firearm was accidental, the robbery was spontaneous, and there was no evidence of serious harm to the victim. The magistrate erred in failing to give sufficient weight to these mitigating circumstances. Consequently, the sentences were set aside a…