S v Msomi (R169/2019)
S v Msomi (R169/2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 210 (7 November 2019)
The court found that the sentence imposed by the relief magistrate was incompetent because it provided an alternative of a fine to imprisonment, contrary to the statutory requirements for dealing in dagga. The correct approach is to impose imprisonment, which may be suspended, and a fine may only be imposed in addition to imprisonment. The court replaced the sentence to align with the statutory framework and the intention of the trial magistrate, confirming the conviction and imposing a fine together with a wholly suspended term of imprisonment, with conditions attached.
Source excerpt
- Sentencing Incompetence
- Drugs And Drug Trafficking Act
- Review Proceedings
- Forfeiture Of Property