Nhlapo v Zimu (2016/8478) [2017] ZAGPJHC 236 (1 September 2017)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2016/8478
Judge
Adams
The court held that claims for prospective losses arising from breach of promise to marry are no longer recognised in South African law, as such claims do not reflect current public policy or constitutional values. The plaintiff's claim for prospective losses was dismissed. However, the court found that the plaintiff had proven entitlement to actual damages for expenses incurred in anticipation of marriage, specifically half the cost of in vitro fertilisation treatment, based on express or tacit agreement between the parties. The plaintiff was also awarded modest sentimental damages under the…
Kumalo v Cycle Lab (Pty) Ltd (31871/2008) [2011] ZAGPJHC 56 (17 June 2011)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
31871/2008
Judge
Boruchowitz
High Court held that using Julia Basetsana Kumalo’s photo in advertising without consent constituted iniuria. Damages were left for later determination.
Van Jaarsveld v Bridges (344/09) [2010] ZASCA 76; 2010 (4) SA 558 (SCA) ; [2010] 4 All SA 389 (SCA) (27 May 2010)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
344/09
Judges
Harms, Nugent, Van Heerden, Majiedt, Seriti
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the action for breach of promise to marry must be reassessed in light of contemporary public policy and societal mores. Engagements are no longer rigidly contractual, and claims for prospective losses are speculative and not legally sustainable. Only actual losses, proven and within the contemplation of the parties, may be recoverable. The court found that the appellant's termination of the engagement was not contumacious or injurious in the delictual sense, as the communications were apologetic and not objectively insulting. The respondent's claims for s…
Minister of Justice and Another v Bosch NO and Others (J1099/01) [2005] ZALC 95; (2006) 27 ILJ 166 (LC) (20 October 2005)
Court
Labour Court
Case number
J1099/01
Judge
Gush
Labour Court review of an arbitration award on demotion, benefits and damages. The court upheld the demotion finding but set aside the benefits award and R40,000 compensation.