W[....] v W[....] (17217/2019)
W[....] v W[....] (17217/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 364 (10 December 2020)
The High Court found the respondent in contempt for non-payment of Rule 43 maintenance, rejected his sequestration and unemployment defences, and ordered payment within seven days.
- Rule 43 Maintenance
- Civil Contempt Of Court
- Pendente Lite Relief
- Anti Dissipation Order
- Punitive Costs
- Sequestration And Intervention