South Africa Case Law

Mercedes-Benz Finance and Insurance, a Division of Mercedes-Benz Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Thobejane (16432/2019)

Mercedes-Benz Finance and Insurance, a Division of Mercedes-Benz Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Thobejane (16432/2019) [2025] ZAGPPHC 733 (28 July 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

16432/2019

Judge

Stone AJ

The court found that the respondent breached the settlement agreement, which was made an order of court, by failing to make the required payments. The respondent's defences regarding alleged fraudulent conduct and procedural irregularities were unsupported by evidence and did not constitute valid grounds to prevent enforcement of the order. The court held that substance must be preferred over form, and any procedural irregularity in the application was condoned, as the respondent suffered no prejudice and had ample opportunity to respond. The applicant was entitled to judgment in terms of the…

Source excerpt

• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Credit Agreement Breach
• Consent To Judgment
• National Credit Act Compliance
• Condonation Of Procedural Irregularity

Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Ramodibedi and Another (2024/029976)

Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Ramodibedi and Another (2024/029976) [2025] ZAGPJHC 641 (27 June 2025)

Court

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Case number

2024/029976

Judge

EF Dippenaar

The court found that the respondents' obligations under the guarantee and settlement agreement are independent and joint and several with those of Mr Dikhuba. The existence of a judgment against Mr Dikhuba does not release the respondents from liability, nor does it result in double recovery, as payment by any party absolves the others to the extent of payment. The settlement agreement did not novate the guarantee, and no apportionment of liability was agreed. The respondents failed to establish any factual or legal basis for their public policy defence, and their interpretation of the agreem…

Source excerpt

• Guarantee Liability
• Joint And Several Liability
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Public Policy Contracts
• Pacta Sunt Servanda

Tshabalala and Others v Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality and Others (J928/2022; J1053/22; J1051/22; J1192/22)

Tshabalala and Others v Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality and Others (J928/2022; J1053/22; J1051/22; J1192/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 181 (14 May 2025)

Court

Labour Court Johannesburg

Case number

J928/2022; J1053/22; J1051/22; J1192/22

Judge

Tlhotlhalemaje

Consolidated contempt applications over municipal salary and post-level disputes were dismissed after the Labour Court found the rule nisi had lapsed and compliance had occurred.

• Contempt Of Court
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Arbitration Award Compliance
• Rule Nisi Lapse
• Money Judgment Enforcement
• Contempt-of-court

Nkwanyana and Another v Open Mic Productions (Pty) Ltd and Another (098393/2023)

Nkwanyana and Another v Open Mic Productions (Pty) Ltd and Another (098393/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 422 (9 May 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

098393/2023

Judge

G N Moshoana

The court held that the settlement agreement, including the joint venture clause, is valid and enforceable, having been made an order of court. The applicants' attempt to obtain a declaratory order freeing themselves from the joint venture obligation was rejected, as the clause does not constitute an unenforceable agreement to agree but rather sets out a binding obligation and a mechanism for implementation. The court found that the applicants failed to plead a proper case for mandamus or any form of interdict, and that motion proceedings were inappropriate for resolving the factual dispute r…

Source excerpt

• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Declaratory Relief
• Specific Performance
• Contempt Of Court
• Motion Proceedings
• Contractual Obligations

A.M v H.M and Others (A127/2024; 42362/2021)

A.M v H.M and Others (A127/2024; 42362/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 332 (27 March 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

A127/2024; 42362/2021

Judges

Labuschagne, Bam, Mbongwe

Full Court appeal in Pretoria held that a trust was properly cited and that several exceptions should not have been upheld; the appeal succeeded with costs.

• Trust Property Control Act
• Specific Performance
• Joinder Of Parties
• Suretyship
• Exception Procedure
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement

Redink Rentals (RF) Limited v Educor Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (D11077/2023)

Redink Rentals (RF) Limited v Educor Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (D11077/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 13 (27 March 2025)

Court

Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban

Case number

D11077/2023

Judge

Mathenjwa

The High Court held that enforcing a settlement agreement after withdrawal of earlier proceedings was not an irregular step, and dismissed the respondents' application.

• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Irregular Step Application
• Rule 41 4 Interpretation
• Condonation For Late Filing
• Settlement-agreement-enforcement
• Irregular-step

Brown and Another v Nedbank Limited (1294/2016)

Brown and Another v Nedbank Limited (1294/2016) [2025] ZAWCHC 145 (24 March 2025)

Court

Western Cape High Court, Cape Town

Case number

1294/2016

Judge

P. S. Van Zyl

The High Court dismissed an application to compel further credit and related relief under a settlement agreement, and ordered the applicants to pay costs.

• National Credit Act
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Mortgage Bond Liability
• Interim Interdict
• Costs Award
• National-credit-act

K.G v D.G and Others (B957/2023)

K.G v D.G and Others (B957/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 130 (17 February 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

B957/2023

Judge

Nyathi

The applicant established a prima facie right to the property based on the settlement agreement and the Rule 43 court order, both of which support her claim to the property pending the divorce. The urgency of the application was justified, as the applicant sought compliance before launching proceedings and acted promptly upon learning of the sale agreement. The respondent's financial arguments were found to be unconvincing, given his substantial income and prior findings of contempt. The sale of the property would irreparably harm the applicant by rendering her claim and any future judgment m…

Source excerpt

• Anti Dissipation Interdict
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Rule 43 Application
• Prima Facie Right
• Balance Of Convenience

Alana v Monoline Investments 8 Trust (2020/37977)

Alana v Monoline Investments 8 Trust (2020/37977) [2025] ZAGPJHC 47 (23 January 2025)

Court

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Case number

2020/37977

Judge

Dlamini

The court held that it does not have the power to make a settlement agreement an order of court where the agreement was concluded prior to the commencement of litigation and does not relate to a pending lis between the parties. The applicant's additional claim for a money order was dismissed as it was not sought in the notice of motion or founding affidavit, and no supporting evidence was adduced. The application was accordingly dismissed, and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Source excerpt

• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Housing Development Schemes For Retired Persons Act
• Jurisdiction Of High Court
• Life Rights Agreement

D.L.H v A.D.H and Another (2014/11667)

D.L.H v A.D.H and Another (2014/11667) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1282 (13 December 2024)

Court

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Case number

2014/11667

Judge

Lamprecht

High Court contempt application arising from a divorce settlement failed, with condonation refused for a late replying affidavit and no order made.

• Contempt Of Court
• Divorce Settlement
• Condonation
• Motion Proceedings
• Settlement Agreement Enforcement
• Contempt-of-court