Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v White Rock Property Trading Pty Ltd (26077/2008) [2014] ZAGPPHC 259 (29 April 2014)
The court held that a rule 46(11) application was unnecessary where the sheriff’s report was already required, and disallowed costs for the application.
Sheriff of the High Court of South Africa, Johannesburg South v Motsoeneng (58266/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 250 (14 April 2014)
High Court application under rule 46(11) of the Uniform Rules of Court. The court granted relief on prayers 1 and 2, ordered the deposit held in trust, and postponed other prayers.
Sheriff of the High Court of South Africa, Alberton v Nlapo (53977/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 273 (14 April 2014)
The High Court considered a Rule 46(11) application and granted limited relief, while directing that the respondent’s deposit be held in trust pending finalisation.
Sheriff Wonderboom v Msomi obo Cate Properties (13731/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 217 (4 April 2014)
The High Court held that rule 46(11) requires the sheriff to file a report, not a formal application, and that unnecessary costs should be avoided.
Explore more
