Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPPHC 214

Van Der Merwe N.O. v Du Plessis, In Re; Nedbank Limited v Jacobs (12149/2012)

Van Der Merwe N.O. v Du Plessis, In Re; Nedbank Limited v Jacobs (12149/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 214 (22 April 2014)

The court held that, in terms of rule 46(11) of the Uniform Rules of Court, the sheriff is required to file a report and that an application which results in unnecessary costs is not necessary. The court relied on the precedent set in Sheriff, Hlabisa and Nongoma v Shobeka, confirming that the process should be streamlined to avoid unnecessary expenditure. Accordingly, the court granted the relief sought in prayers 1 and 3 of the notice of motion, postponed prayer 2 sine die, and dismissed prayer 4.

  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 46
  • Sheriff Report Requirements
  • Costs In Application Proceedings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.