S v Mndawe (Conviction) (CC22/2021) [2022] ZAMPMBHC 55 (4 February 2022)
Court
Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
Case number
CC22/2021
Judge
Greyling-Coetzer
The court found that the accused's conduct constituted a deliberate and systematic course of wrongful action. The accused knew each victim, all of whom visited his homestead, where arguments escalated to fatal assaults. The bodies were disposed of in a calculated manner to evade detection, with three buried in the garden and two under a cement floor. The repeated pattern over sixteen months, targeting young black females, and the methodical concealment of bodies supported the inference of premeditation. The accused's explanation of acting in the heat of the moment was rejected as improbable g…
Ndlovu and Another v S (A41/2021) [2021] ZAGPJHC 799 (14 October 2021)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A41/2021
Judges
Mahalelo, Graf
Appeal against conviction dismissed after the High Court found circumstantial evidence and recovered stolen property linked the appellants to a series of robberies.
S v Mbatha (SS118/19) [2020] ZAGPJHC 343 (20 August 2020)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
SS118/19
Judge
Mtati AJ
The court found that the accused's fingerprint on the broken window was fresh and consistent with the timing of the offence on 16 May 2019. The accused's explanation for the presence of his fingerprint was opportunistic and tailored to fit the evidence as it emerged. The accused's version was not reasonably possibly true and failed to create doubt. The court accepted the similar fact evidence, noting the accused previously broke into the same house through the same window and stole the same item, demonstrating a pattern of conduct. The totality of the circumstantial evidence, including the fi…
S v Simelane (Roelofse AJ) [2020] ZAMPMBHC 3; CC60/17 (4 March 2020)
Court
Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
Case number
CC60/17
Judge
Roelofse
The court found that Mr Simelane's consistent modus operandi, his possession of the deceased's vehicles, and his admissions in section 220 statements and testimony established a pattern of conduct. The evidence, including pointing outs and statements to police and magistrate, was lawfully admitted and corroborated by witness testimony. The court rejected Mr Simelane's denials and explanations as improbable and false. The totality of the evidence, including circumstantial and similar fact evidence, excluded any reasonable doubt as to the accused's guilt. The court concluded that Mr Simelane mu…
Western Cape Government: Department of Education v Hanekom NO and Others (C92/2018; C757/2018) [2019] ZALCCT 31 (17 October 2019)
Court
Labour Court Cape Town
Case number
C92/2018; C757/2018
Judge
BN Conradie
Labour Court review upheld dismissal for removing school gas burners without permission, finding the arbitrator wrongly discounted prior theft misconduct and sanction relevance.
S v Ndlovu and Others (CC90/2017) [2019] ZAECGHC 25; [2019] 2 All SA 773 (ECG) (15 March 2019)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CC90/2017
Judge
Pickering
Multiple accused were convicted for a rhino-poaching scheme after the court accepted challenged search evidence, forensic dart comparisons, cellphone data, and circumstantial links.
Road Accident Fund v Chin (23037/2016) [2017] ZAWCHC 153; 2018 (3) SA 547 (WCC) (9 November 2017)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
23037/2016
Judge
H Slingers
The court ordered the respondent to attend a medical examination by the RAF’s nominated doctor, finding her objections to that examiner were not substantiated.
S v Mbasigidi (SS214/2015) [2016] ZAGPJHC 181 (5 July 2016)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
SS214/2015
Judge
Dosio
The High Court convicted the accused of kidnapping, multiple rapes, assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, and murder after DNA and similar fact evidence linked him to repeated attacks.