Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2024] ZAGPPHC 1091

Jonsson Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Aktiebolaget, P.J Jonnson Och Soner (52169/2021)

Jonsson Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Aktiebolaget, P.J Jonnson Och Soner (52169/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1091 (23 October 2024)

The High Court dismissed an opposition to JONNSON registration in class 7, holding that heavy mining machinery is too dissimilar from protective clothing and footwear to cause confusion.

  • Trade Mark Opposition
  • Similarity Of Goods
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Distinctive Character
  • Unfair Advantage
  • Passing Off
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2021] ZAGPPHC 844

Takis Biltong (Pty) Ltd v Grupo Bimbo S.A.B DE C.V (A393/2018)

Takis Biltong (Pty) Ltd v Grupo Bimbo S.A.B DE C.V (A393/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 844; 2021 BIP 12 (GP); [2021] HIPR 183 (GP) (10 December 2021)

The High Court dismissed an appeal in a trade mark dispute, finding no likelihood of confusion between TAKIS and TAKIS FUEGO because the goods differed.

  • Trade Mark Infringement
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Similarity Of Goods
  • Removal From Register
  • Trade-mark-infringement
  • Likelihood-of-confusion
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2015] ZAGPPHC 222

Chantelle v Designer Group (Pty) Ltd (A743/2013)

Chantelle v Designer Group (Pty) Ltd (A743/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 222; 2015 BIP 231 (GP) (24 April 2015)

The court found that the Registrar of Trade Marks misdirected themselves by failing to apply the doctrine of notional use and the correct allocation of onus under section 10(14) of the Trade Marks Act. The evidence established that the appellant's CHANTELLE mark is well-known in South Africa for women's fashion items and that goods covered by the respondent's Class 3 application are similar or related, often sold in close proximity in retail outlets. The identical marks are likely to cause confusion or deception among consumers regarding the origin of the goods. The Registrar erred by focusin…

  • Trade Mark Registration
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Notional Use
  • Similarity Of Goods
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.