Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPJHC 714

MacKay v Bidcorp Food Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (40557/17)

MacKay v Bidcorp Food Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (40557/17) [2018] ZAGPJHC 714 (28 June 2018)

The court found that the applicant did not resign but was retrenched due to operational requirements following the sale and restructuring of Patleys. The supplementary agreement was not a simulated contract but reflected the true nature of the separation, negotiated openly and for legitimate commercial reasons. Bidcorp failed to establish a genuine dispute of fact or simulation, as its evidence was insufficient and lacked direct knowledge of the circumstances. The applicant was candid about preserving his entitlement to the consideration, and the agreements were implemented as negotiated. The…

  • Share Option Scheme
  • Mutual Separation Agreement
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Retrenchment
  • Repudiation Of Contract
  • Severance Pay
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] ZAGPPHC 586

Grindrod v Torode and Others (A803/2014)

Grindrod v Torode and Others (A803/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 586 (20 May 2016)

The High Court held that the restructured loan did not contravene section 38 of the Companies Act and upheld the Bank’s claim; the cross-appeal failed.

  • Companies Act Section 38
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Suretyship Liability
  • Condictio Indebiti
  • Mortgage Bond Enforcement
  • Companies-act-section-38
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2012] ZAWCHC 311

Maharage v Braaf and Others (25657/2011)

Maharage v Braaf and Others (25657/2011) [2012] ZAWCHC 311 (17 September 2012)

The High Court refused enforcement of a deed of sale, finding the transaction was a simulation aimed at securing repayment rather than transferring ownership.

  • Specific Performance
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Enforcement Of Deed Of Sale
  • Misrepresentation
  • Non Disclosure
  • Specific-performance
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2012] ZALCJHB 41

Ndaba v Department of Communications (JS 925/2010)

Ndaba v Department of Communications (JS 925/2010) [2012] ZALCJHB 41 (11 May 2012)

The Labour Court held that the purported secondment contract was a simulation and unenforceable, dismissing Ndaba’s claim for payment of the unexpired term.

  • Public Service Act
  • Secondment
  • Fixed Term Contracts
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Appointment Procedure
  • Public-service-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2010] ZAECGHC 33

Sign and Seal Trading 206 (Pty) Ltd v M J Beef (Pty) Ltd and Others (682/10)

Sign and Seal Trading 206 (Pty) Ltd v M J Beef (Pty) Ltd and Others (682/10) [2010] ZAECGHC 33 (20 May 2010)

The court refused summary judgment in a loan claim, finding the defendants raised a bona fide defence based on possible National Credit Act applicability.

  • Summary Judgment
  • National Credit Act
  • Suretyship
  • Contract Rectification
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Interest Rate Enforceability
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2005] ZASCA 80

Maize Board v Jackson (396/2004)

Maize Board v Jackson (396/2004) [2005] ZASCA 80; [2006] 3 All SA 511 (SCA); 2005 (6) SA 592 (SCA) (19 September 2005)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that lease and management agreements were simulated to disguise a maize sale, making the respondent liable for levies.

  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Levies On Agricultural Products
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Avoidance Of Statutory Obligations
  • Simulation-of-contract
  • Statutory-avoidance
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2002] ZASCA 130

Absa Bank Ltd t/a Bankfin v Jordashe Auto CC (402/2001)

Absa Bank Ltd t/a Bankfin v Jordashe Auto CC (402/2001) [2002] ZASCA 130; [2003] 1 All SA 401 (SCA); 2003 (1) SA 401 (SCA) (27 September 2002)

The court held Absa had not proven ownership of the vehicles on the papers and rejected estoppel on the evidence available, referring key factual disputes to oral evidence.

  • Ownership Of Moveable Property
  • Estoppel
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Delivery Of Goods
  • Floor Plan Agreements
  • Ownership-of-movable-property
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.