Oguh v The State (A151/2023) [2025] ZAFSHC 220 (18 July 2025)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A151/2023
Judges
Daniso, Van Rhyn
High Court criminal appeal on identification evidence and alibi defence. The conviction for robbery with aggravating circumstances was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Rantapi and Another v S (A160/2023) [2024] ZAFSHC 189 (20 June 2024)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A160/2023
Judges
Opperman, Majosi
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against murder and assault convictions, holding that the trial court correctly assessed circumstantial evidence and witness credibility.
Khambule v S (AR 267/2018) [2023] ZAKZPHC 35 (24 March 2023)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
AR 267/2018
Judges
Mngadi, Mathenjwa
The court found that the only evidence implicating the appellant was the complainant's identification, which was uncorroborated and unreliable due to inconsistencies between her testimony and police statement, lack of corroboration from other witnesses, and poor lighting conditions at the scene. The warning statement relied upon by the regional magistrate was inadmissible as it was not proved to be voluntary and was made to a non-commissioned officer. The defects in the appeal record and absence of leave to appeal on the robbery charge were not fatal to the hearing, as the record was sufficie…
Mntungwa v S (A117/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 67 (27 May 2021)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A117/2020
Judges
T P Mudau, S Yacoob, M Moleleki
The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction, finding that the identification evidence was reliable and the appellant’s alibi was not credible.
Tsamaisi v S (CA&R 35/2020) [2021] ZANCHC 19 (16 April 2021)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
CA&R 35/2020
Judges
Williams, Mofokeng
The High Court dismissed a rape conviction appeal, holding that the complainant’s identification was reliable and the appellant’s alibi was not credible.
Mahabo v S (A88/2020) [2020] ZAFSHC 223 (21 September 2020)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A88/2020
Judges
Daffue, Opperman
The court found that the evidence of the single witness was not reliable and did not establish the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The circumstantial evidence was not properly applied, as it failed to exclude reasonable alternative inferences and did not point conclusively to the appellant as the perpetrator. The trial court misdirected itself by making a negative deduction from the appellant’s failure to testify, contrary to constitutional principles. The State’s failure to call other available witnesses further weakened its case. In light of these misdirections and the concession…