TMA Express Road and Another v Scholtz and Another (2025/071413) [2025] ZAGPJHC 636 (25 June 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2025/071413
Judge
Smit
The High Court upheld a restraint and confidentiality claim against a former logistics manager, enforcing a 12-month restriction and granting a final interdict.
Indwe Risk Services (Pty) Ltd v Coyne and Another (16343/2022P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 154 (28 November 2023)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
16343/2022P
Judge
P C Bezuidenhout
The High Court enforced a restraint and confidentiality agreement in part, limiting it to six months and narrowing its scope, while refusing punitive costs.
Hylton Ackerman (Pty) Ltd t/a PC Worx Rustenburg v Theron and Another (J683/23) [2023] ZALCJHB 155 (26 May 2023)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
J683/23
Judge
GN Moshoana
The court found that a valid and enforceable restraint of trade agreement existed between the applicant and the first respondent. The respondents' argument that only a small overlap existed between the businesses was rejected; even minimal competition suffices to establish rivalry. The visit by Theron and a Prime representative to Helam Mining, a client of the applicant, was indicative of solicitation and breach of the restraint. The court concluded that Prime and the applicant are competitors and that Theron breached the restraint, prejudicing the applicant's protectable interests. The appli…
TWK Agri (Pty) Ltd v Botha and Others (J125/2023) [2023] ZALCJHB 42 (7 March 2023)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
J125/2023
Judge
Mabaso
Labour Court urgent application enforcing a 12-month restraint and confidentiality clauses against former employees who solicited clients and moved business to a competitor.
Cargocare Freight Services (Pty) Ltd v Raath (2021/37630) [2021] ZAGPJHC 497 (28 September 2021)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2021/37630
Judge
Molahlehi
Urgent restraint-of-trade application dismissed after the court found no proof the respondent solicited clients and held the restraint’s scope was unreasonable.
Super Group Trading (Pty) Ltd v Labusschagne and Another (J2268/17) [2017] ZALCJHB 489 (14 November 2017)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
J2268/17
Judge
GN Moshoana
The court found that the restraint of trade agreement between the applicant and the first respondent was valid and enforceable. The applicant acted expeditiously upon discovering the breach, and urgency was justified. The first respondent breached the agreement by joining a competitor and soliciting clients of the applicant, as evidenced by unchallenged testimony and declarations obtained from customers. The first respondent had access to confidential information and trade secrets, and there was a real likelihood of use or disclosure to the second respondent. The first respondent failed to pr…