Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2018] ZAECPEHC 61

Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality v Erastyle (Pty) Ltd and Others (398/2016)

Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality v Erastyle (Pty) Ltd and Others (398/2016) [2018] ZAECPEHC 61; 2019 (3) SA 559 (ECP) (6 November 2018)

The court held that Rule 53 is not a mandatory procedure for a municipality seeking to review its own decisions, especially where the decision-maker is in possession of the record and reasons. The procedural benefits conferred by Rule 53 are intended for parties without access to the record, and can be waived by the applicant. The plaintiff had properly pleaded its case and given notice to affected parties, satisfying the requirements for review. Section 32(2)(b) of the MFMA does not preclude recovery of irregular expenditure unless the expenditure has been certified as irrecoverable and writ…

  • Municipal Finance Management Act
  • Legality Review
  • Rule 53 Procedure
  • Irregular Expenditure
  • Unlawful Enrichment
  • Special Plea Dismissal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.