Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ceva Logistics South Africa (Pty) Ltd v MMS Mobile Cranes CC (20296/2020) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1129 (12 July 2024)
High Court summary judgment granted for logistics charges after the court found the respondent had accepted the quoted costs and failed to raise a bona fide defence.
Aristopix (Pty) Ltd v TFM Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (EL1072/2014; ECD2372/2014) [2018] ZAECELLC 7 (26 March 2018)
The court dismissed a claim for damages arising from alleged late delivery and defective modification of vehicles, finding the plaintiff failed to prove its asserted contract terms.
Ward v Netbet (Pty) Ltd t/a Sportingbet South Africa (9847/2015) [2017] ZAWCHC 133 (20 November 2017)
The court found that the applicant was bound by the respondent's standard terms and conditions, which clearly limited the maximum payout to R1,000,000.00 per customer per day. The applicant had assented to these terms when opening his account and was repeatedly notified of the limits both before and after placing bets. The betting slip's indication of a higher possible payout was subject to the stated limits, and there was no conflict between the standard terms and the transaction-specific terms. The doctrines of variation, waiver, or representation did not assist the applicant, as no represe…
Source excerpt
Cladall Roofing (Pty) Ltd v SS Profiling (Pty) Ltd (515/08) [2009] ZASCA 92; [2010] 1 All SA 114 (SCA) (14 September 2009)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that clauses about defects and notice could not shield a seller where the goods delivered did not amount to contractual performance.
Africa Solar (Pty) Ltd v Divwatt (Pty) Ltd (365/2000) [2002] ZASCA 25; [2002] 3 All SA 369 (A); 2002 (4) SA 681 (SCA) (28 March 2002)
The court held the seller’s standard terms were not incorporated into a solar-panel sale, so the buyer could raise non-payment and damages issues.
LTA Mitec Ltd. v Genrec Steel Structures (Pty) Ltd. (258/94) [1995] ZASCA 153 (29 November 1995)
Appeal over crane-hire liability succeeded. The court found Genrec had not proved Mitec was the hirer or that Genrec’s standard terms bound Mitec.
Explore more
