Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Berte Van Zyl (Pty) Ltd v Mohale and Another (7766/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 42 (12 March 2025)
The High Court granted interdicts stopping roadside vendor trading and compelled SANRAL to enforce the National Roads Act against unlawful trading.
Siqalo Foods (Pty) Ltd v Clover SA (Pty) Ltd (425/2022) [2023] ZASCA 82 (31 May 2023)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the appellant’s product label contravened the statutory requirements under the Agricultural Product Standards Act and its regulations. The dominant display of the word 'BUTTER' on the label, with the class designation 'modified butter' rendered virtually invisible, was likely to mislead consumers into believing the product was pure butter. The evidence, including consumer research and visual analysis, supported the conclusion that the label created a false or misleading impression as to the nature and class of the product. The court rejected the appellan…
Source excerpt
Mayfair Residents Association and Others v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others (2148/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 55 (19 May 2021)
The High Court held that Erf 56 was zoned as public open space and could not lawfully be used for parking, storage or retail activity. It granted interdicts and nuisance relief.
Mayfair Residents Association and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others (2148/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 148 (19 May 2021)
The court found that Erf 56 is zoned as 'public open space' and its use by Dragon City and Anchor Projects for parking, storage, and commercial activities is unlawful under both the 1979 and 2018 Schemes. The City of Johannesburg could not lawfully consent to such use, nor could it override zoning restrictions by lease. The persistent commercial use has deprived residents of recreational space and caused unreasonable nuisance through noise, fumes, and traffic congestion. The applicants, as residents in the vicinity, are entitled to protection under the Scheme and to relief in the form of inte…
Source excerpt
City of Johannesburg v Horizon Bay Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another (30293/11) [2011] ZAGPJHC 204 (8 December 2011)
The City of Johannesburg sought to stop spray-painting and panel beating at Longmeadow, but the court found no properly gazetted prohibition and dismissed the application with costs.
National Home Builders Registration Council v Van Rooyen and Others (11273/2006) [2006] ZAGPHC 170 (20 April 2006)
The High Court held that a trust building a home for beneficiaries’ occupation fell within the Act’s exclusion, so NHBRC registration and enrolment were not required.
Club Twelve v Rand Water Board; Rand Water Board v Johannes and Another (141/2003) [2005] ZAFSHC 30 (3 March 2005)
The court dismissed an exception to particulars of claim, holding that the plaintiff had pleaded a sufficient statutory basis to seek demolition relief.
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Davis and Others v Eskom (J3113/2001) [2001] ZALC 110; [2001] 10 BLLR 1144 (LC); (2001) 22 ILJ 2023 (LC) (25 July 2001)
The Labour Court held that section 64(4) barred Eskom from unilaterally implementing a wage increase before 30 days had elapsed from referral of the specific dispute to the CCMA.
Explore more
