Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2022] ZASCA 15

Deltamune (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tiger Brands Limited and Others (847/2020)

Deltamune (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tiger Brands Limited and Others (847/2020) [2022] ZASCA 15; [2022] 2 All SA 26 (SCA); 2022 (3) SA 339 (SCA) (4 February 2022)

The SCA set aside most third-party subpoenas in a listeriosis class action, holding they were too broad, insufficiently specific, and largely irrelevant.

  • Subpoena Duces Tecum
  • Relevance Of Evidence
  • Class Action Procedure
  • Strict Liability Consumer Protection
  • Negligence
  • Specificity Of Subpoena
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAGPJHC 160

Tiger Brands Limited and Others v Pillay and Others (Famous Brands and Another Intervening) (2019/25309; 2018/12835; 2019/36431)

Tiger Brands Limited and Others v Pillay and Others (Famous Brands and Another Intervening) (2019/25309; 2018/12835; 2019/36431) [2020] ZAGPJHC 160 (23 June 2020)

The High Court held that Tiger Brands could compel non-party document production by subpoena in the listeriosis class action, subject to access controls.

  • Subpoena Production
  • Class Action Procedure
  • Strict Liability Consumer Protection
  • Confidentiality And Discovery
  • Fair Trial Right
  • Relevance Of Evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.