Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2019] ZALCJHB 345

National Association of South African Workers obo Members v Kings Hire CC (J2290/19)

National Association of South African Workers obo Members v Kings Hire CC (J2290/19) [2019] ZALCJHB 345; (2020) 41 ILJ 685 (LC); [2020] 3 BLLR 312 (LC) (29 November 2019)

The Labour Court dismissed an urgent interdict over a lock-out tied to a 13th cheque dispute, finding no urgency, no clear right, and proper notice.

  • Lock Out
  • Urgency In Labour Disputes
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Strike Notice
  • Section 64 Lra
  • No Work No Pay
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2016] ZALCJHB 548

Xinergistrix (Pty) Ltd v Motor Transport Workers Union of South Africa (MTWUSA) and Others (J2801/16)

Xinergistrix (Pty) Ltd v Motor Transport Workers Union of South Africa (MTWUSA) and Others (J2801/16) [2016] ZALCJHB 548 (30 December 2016)

The Labour Court held that withdrawing disputed transport did not amount to a unilateral change to conditions of employment, and interdicted the strike.

  • Unprotected Strike
  • Unilateral Change To Terms
  • Collective Agreement
  • Interdict
  • Strike Notice
  • Unprotected-strike
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2015] ZALAC 14

Putco (Pty) Limited v Transport And Allied Workers Union of South Africa and Another (JA106/13)

Putco (Pty) Limited v Transport And Allied Workers Union of South Africa and Another (JA106/13) [2015] ZALAC 14; [2015] 8 BLLR 783 (LAC); (2015) 36 ILJ 2048 (LAC) (5 May 2015)

The Labour Appeal Court held that the Labour Court erred in resolving factual disputes regarding participation in the strike on the papers without referring the matter to oral evidence, as required by the Plascon-Evans rule. The Court found that the lock-out was lawfully instituted against all employees in the bargaining unit, including members of the first respondent, because the wage negotiations and resultant collective agreement at the bargaining council affected all employees, and the majoritarian principle applied. The employer was entitled to lock-out all employees who did not accept i…

  • Lock Out
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Majoritarianism
  • Strike Notice
  • Protected Strike
  • Extension Of Collective Agreement
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2014] ZALCJHB 506

National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) obo Members v National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Others (J2976/2014)

National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) obo Members v National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Others (J2976/2014) [2014] ZALCJHB 506; [2015] 3 BLLR 321 (LC) ; (2015) 36 ILJ 753 (LC) (23 December 2014)

The Labour Court held NEASA’s continued lockout unlawful after NUMSA unconditionally accepted the lockout demands, and ordered wages paid and the lockout stopped.

  • Unlawful Lockout
  • Final Interdict
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Strike Notice
  • Acceptance Of Demands
  • Unlawful-lockout
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.