University of the Free State v Dlanjwa and Others (919/2017)
University of the Free State v Dlanjwa and Others (919/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 152 (18 September 2017)
The court found that the applicant failed to prove that the first respondent incited or led unlawful protest action. The respondent's version, supported by affidavits and annexures, was credible and not so far-fetched as to be rejected on the papers. The only conduct attributed to the first respondent was the handing over of the memorandum, which was insufficient to justify a final interdict. The applicant conceded that the respondent assisted in calming the situation and that there was no evidence of direct involvement in disruptive acts. Accordingly, the requirements for a final interdict w…
Source excerpt
- Interim Interdict
- Final Interdict
- Student Protest Action
- University Governance
- Joinder Of Parties