Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Admiralty And Maritime [2001] ZASCA 34

Den Norske Bank ASA v Madsen CV (139/99)

Den Norske Bank ASA v Madsen CV (139/99) [2001] ZASCA 34; [2001] 3 All SA 392 (A); 2001 (3) SA 529 (SCA) (23 March 2001)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'a claim which arose' in section 11(4)(c) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 refers to the time when the claim comes into existence, not when it becomes due and payable. The Court reasoned that the legislative context, especially the provisions of section 10A(4)(a), supports this interpretation, as claims may be proved before they are enforceable. The distinction between existence and enforceability is well established in South African law, and the legislature would have used different wording if it intended otherwise. The…

  • Ranking Of Maritime Claims
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Interpretation Of Statutes
  • Priority Of Creditors
  • Submission Of Proof
  • Mortgagee Priority
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.